Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Does a local minimum of a function always satify the Armijo rule?

share|cite|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Assuming that the function $f$ is continuous (and so $\nabla f$ is defined), then the Armijo rule can't be satisfied as an equality for a global minimum. That is you can rewrite the rule as:
$$f(\mathbf{x}_k+\alpha_k\mathbf{p}_k)\leq f(\mathbf{x}_k)+c_1\alpha_k\mathbf{p}_k^{\mathrm T}\nabla f(\mathbf{x}_k) = f(\mathbf{x}_k)$$
since $\nabla f(\mathbf{x}_k)=0$, but the LHS is larger than the RHS because the point $\mathbf{x}_k$ is a minimum. But if the minimum is only local, then you could meet the condition by arranging for the step to be to a lower minimum.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.