Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For a family of random variables, I was wondering if independence and Conditional Independence under any condition among them imply each other?

If not, can these two concepts imply one another under some special cases? Thanks!

share|cite|improve this question
The question as you have stated it is vague. Is there some problem or result that is motivating this question? – svenkatr Feb 16 '11 at 22:31
@svenkatr: Is it correct that independent random variables may not be independent conditional on some conditions? Independence conditional on some conditions may not imply independence. So I was wondering: (1) if Independence conditional on any condition and independence may imply each other; (2) what are some useful cases where one can imply the other? – Tim Feb 16 '11 at 23:25
What is independence under any condition? If you mean independence under every possible conditioning, the condition is rarely fulfilled... For example, random variables $x$ and $y$ are not independent conditionally on $[x<y]$ if you exclude some very degenerate cases. – Did Feb 17 '11 at 11:34
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Independence does not imply conditional independence: for instance, independent random variables are rarely independent conditionally on their sum or on their maximum.

Conditional independence does not imply independence: for instance, conditionally independent random variables uniform on $(0,u)$ where $u$ is uniform on $(0,1)$ are not independent.

share|cite|improve this answer

For the first question (independence does not imply conditional independence), one of my favorite simple counterexamples works. Flip two fair coins. Let $A$ be the event that the first coin is heads, $B$ the event that the second coin is heads, $C$ the event that the two coins are the same (both heads or both tails). Clearly $A$ and $B$ are independent, but they are not conditionally independent given $C$. If you want an example with random variables, consider the indicators $1_A, 1_B, 1_C$.

Of interest here is that $A,B,C$ are pairwise independent but not mutually independent (since any two determine the third).

share|cite|improve this answer
This is a great answer. Should be the accepted one in my opinion. It would be great if there's an intuitive real world example for the inverse as well, where a conditional independence does not imply independence? – dev_nut Dec 16 '14 at 19:21
@dev_nut: Trivial example: $A$ and $A$ are conditionally independent given $A$, but not independent. – Nate Eldredge Dec 16 '14 at 19:33
Thanks. It's trivial, but real world? :). Not as intuitive as your answer. – dev_nut Dec 16 '14 at 20:32
@NateEldredge any more obvious example? This trivial one is kind of hard to fathom using intuition ;-) – Sнаđошƒаӽ Oct 27 '15 at 16:53

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.