Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Show that the function $g(x)=x^4+x^3+1$ is one-to-one on $[0,2]$.

My attempt

To prove one-to-oneness, we shall use the definition, that is, if $f(x_1)=f(x_2)$ , then $x_1=x_2$ for all $x_1,x_2\in[0,2]$

Suppose $f(x_1)=f(x_2)$, then ${x_1}^4+{x_1}^3+1={x_2}^4+{x_2}^3+1$

Which wasn't much of an attempt, as I got stuck.

Also I am rather new to proving conjections and surjections.

Help! Thanks in advance!

share|cite|improve this question
Do you have any properties of one-to-one fuctions that you can use? For example, if $f$ and $g$ are both one-to-one, then $f\circ g$ is one-to-one. Can you use that? – Todd Wilcox Oct 29 '12 at 15:12
Hint: derivative. – Did Oct 29 '12 at 15:13
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The derivative is $x \mapsto 4x^3 + 3x^2$ which is non-negative on $[0,2]$. So your functions is increasing on $[0,2]$ so it is one-to-one on $[0,2]$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Not positive at 0. – Did Oct 29 '12 at 15:14
I meant non-negative. In my country (France), x positive <=> x >= 0 and x strictly positive <=> x > 0 – xavierm02 Oct 29 '12 at 15:16
Does it work the same for increasing? Should I put "non-decreasing"? – xavierm02 Oct 29 '12 at 15:17
The function is increasing on $[0,2]$ but the derivative is $>0$ only on $(0,2]$. Hence more care is needed than in the present version of this answer. – Did Oct 29 '12 at 15:32

First, it would be easier to just prove that the function is increasing on the interval. That being said, we may be able to push your solution a bit further. Using difference of fourths and difference of cubes, we have $$0=x_1^4 - x_2^4 + x_1^3 - x_2^3$$ $$=(x_1 - x_2)(x_2^3 + x_2^2x_1 + x_2x_1^2 + x_1^3) + (x_1 - x_2)(x_2^2 + x_1x_2 + x_1^2)$$ factoring out $(x_1 - x_2)$, it's easy to see that the latter part will be positive on the interval, this requires $x_1 = x_2$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Why are you allowed to factor out $x_1-x_2$ if they're equal? – VF1 Oct 29 '12 at 15:17
@VF1 $xy + xz = x(y + z)$ – EuYu Oct 29 '12 at 15:19
Oh, sorry, never mind. For some reason I interpreted "factor" as "divide out by." My mistake. – VF1 Oct 29 '12 at 15:20
Well @VF1, that's exactly what was meant by "factor out" in the above answer: to divide out by! Of course we can assume $\,x_1\neq x_2\,$ , after all we're trying to prove injectivity – DonAntonio Oct 29 '12 at 16:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.