Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've just started reading about classical invariant theory and I'm not seeing how the general pattern should work, maybe it's obvious I don't know...

Let $k$ be a field with $\mathrm{char}\ k = 0$, and let $V$ be the (usual) three dimensional permutation representation $V$ of $\Sigma_3$, the symmetric group on three objects.

Denote by $k[V]^{\Sigma_3}$ the ring of invariants of $\Sigma_3$ over $V$. Then $k[V]^{\Sigma_3}$ is the polynomial ring $k[s_1,s_2,s_3]$ where $s_1,s_2,s_3$ are the so-called elementary symmetric polynomials in three variables, by the fundamental theorem of symmetric polynomials. Analogously, the case $k[V \oplus V]^{\Sigma_3}$ is given by the polarisations of the elementary symmetric polynomials, as prooved by Weyl (in the general case).

Question: How does the form of the generators change (apart from number) if instead we take the standard two dimensional irreducible representation $U$ (this one) of $\Sigma_3$ i.e. the case $k[U]^{\Sigma_3}$ and similarly $k[U \oplus U]^{\Sigma_3}$?

share|improve this question

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.