Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When read Zorich's book Mathematical Analysis Vol I, I figure out a question concerning the Theorem 5, Page 133. That is:

Assuming function $f:(0,+\infty)\to\mathbb{R}, \text{ with } \lim\limits_{\mathbb{N}\ni n\to\infty} f(n)=A\in\mathbb{R}\cup\{+\infty,-\infty\},$ where $\mathbb{N}$ is the set of all positive integers. Is it true that $\lim_{x\to+\infty} f(x)=A$?

I guess that it may be true. But I am not so sure. Maybe it is just a corollary of Theorem 5, page 133 of Zorich's Book (see above). Can anyone help me? If it is false, give your counterexample, and if it is true, prove it. Thanks a lot!

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

No. Consider $f(x) = \sin \pi x$.

share|improve this answer
Thank you, Hagen! I see! –  nuage Oct 28 '12 at 12:04

The answer is negative, and the example by Hagen von Eitzen suffices. If you do not care about regularity, you can also consider the function $$ f(x)= \begin{cases} 0 &\text{if $x$ is rational} \\ 1 &\text{if $x$ is irrational,} \end{cases} $$ for which $f(n)=0$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$ but $\lim_{x \to +\infty} f(x)$ does not exist for obvious reasons.

To understand the situation heuristically, you can recall that $\lim_{x \to +\infty} f(x)=\ell$ if and only if, for any sequence $x_n \to +\infty$ there results $f(x_n) \to \ell$ as $n \to +\infty$. It is reasonable that the behavior of $f$ along one sequence like $x_n=n$ cannot describe the richness of the behavior along any diverging sequence. You can approach $+\infty$ in infinitely many ways, and you must consider them all together, if you want to compute the limit.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.