Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Prove the irrationality of $2^{\frac{1}{n}}$ for $n > 2$

So, we suppose $2^{\frac{1}{n}}$ is rational (= $\frac{p}{q}$). Therefore, $$2 = \frac{p^n}{q^n} \Rightarrow q^n + q^n = p^n$$ and this contradicts Fermat's last theorem. Is this a correct proof?

What do you think about this proof?

share|cite|improve this question
3… – wj32 Oct 28 '12 at 4:01
@wj32 Nice and thanks for the link. – user17762 Oct 28 '12 at 4:01
Can Fermat be proven without this result? – Baby Dragon Oct 28 '12 at 5:30
up vote 5 down vote accepted

You still need to prove it for $n=2$ though. The proof is right for $n >2$. But this proof falls under the category of mosquito nuking proofs.

share|cite|improve this answer

Well if $2=p^n/q^n$, then $2\cdot q^n=p^n$. This implies that 2 divides $p$; thus $2^n$ divides $p^n$. This in turn implies that $2^n$ divides $2\cdot q^n$, but since $n>1$, 2 must divide $q$ as well. This is a contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer
I think the OP, and the rest of us, are well aware of this proof, @one, yet the interesting twist presented by the OP is the use of Fermat's Last Theorem. – DonAntonio Oct 28 '12 at 4:10

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.