Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What do you guys think about this proof? So, we suppose $$2^{\frac{1}{n}}$$ is rational ( = $\frac{p}{q}$). Therefore, $$2 = \frac{p^n}{q^n} \Rightarrow q^n + q^n = p^n$$ and this contradicts fermat's last theorem. Is this correct proof?

share|improve this question
3  
mathoverflow.net/questions/42512/… –  wj32 Oct 28 '12 at 4:01
    
@wj32 Nice and thanks for the link. –  user17762 Oct 28 '12 at 4:01
1  
Can Fermat be proven without this result? –  Baby Dragon Oct 28 '12 at 5:30
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

You still need to prove it for $n=2$ though. The proof is right for $n >2$. But this proof falls under the category of mosquito nuking proofs.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Well if $2=p^n/q^n$, then $2\cdot q^n=p^n$. This implies that 2 divides $p$; thus $2^n$ divides $p^n$. This in turn implies that $2^n$ divides $2\cdot q^n$, but since $n>1$, 2 must divide $q$ as well. This is a contradiction.

share|improve this answer
5  
I think the OP, and the rest of us, are well aware of this proof, @one, yet the interesting twist presented by the OP is the use of Fermat's Last Theorem. –  DonAntonio Oct 28 '12 at 4:10
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.