Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I want to use Integration by parts for general Lebesgue-Stieltjes integrals. The following theorem can be found in the literature:

Theorem: If $F$ and $G$ are right-continuous and non-decreasing functions, we have that: $$ \int_{(a,b]}G(x)\text{d}F(x)=F(b)G(b)-F(a)G(a)- \int_{(a,b]}F(x-)\text{d}G(x),$$ where $F(x-)$ is the left limit of $F$ in $x$.

Does the following result hold:

Theorem: If $F$ and $G$ are left-continuous and non-decreasing functions, we have that: $$ \int_{[a,b)}G(x)\text{d}F(x)=F(b)G(b)-F(a)G(a)- \int_{[a,b)}F(x+)\text{d}G(x),$$ where $F(x+)$ is the right limit of $F$ in $x$.

Is it possible to combine these result. So use integration by parts when $F$ is right cont., $G$ is left cont.?

share|cite|improve this question

You can Compare with the following theorem,

Theorem: Suppose $f$ and $g$ are bounded functions with no common discontinuities on the interval $[a,b]$, and the Riemann-Stieltjes integral of $f$ with respect to $g$ exists. Then the Riemann-Stieltjes integral of $g$ with respect to $f$ exists, and

$$\int_{a}^{b} g(x)df(x) = f(b)g(b)-f(a)g(a)-\int_{a}^{b} f(x)dg(x)\,. $$

share|cite|improve this answer
But it is not possible get rid of the condition of no common discontinuities? – Daniel Linders Oct 26 '12 at 13:51
I guess that common discontinuities can prevent integrability. – Siminore Oct 26 '12 at 14:08
For Riemann-Stieltjes common discontinuities are a problem. But I would think that for Lebesgue-Stieltjes integrals, this is condition is not needed. If the common discontinuities are rc, it is no problem. – Daniel Linders Oct 26 '12 at 14:26

Variants of the above Lebesgue--Stieltjes partial integral results are given in Theorem 21.67(iv) (it holds for general BV functions, by Remarks 21.68) of Real and Abstract Analysis: A modern treatment of the theory of functions of ... E. Hewitt, K. Stromberg p. 419

They seem to answer your question, though at the cost of having terms like $(F(x+)+F(x-))/2$ in place of $F(x)$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.