I doubt there is a reasonable elementary proof. Note that the left-hand sum equals
$$
\sum_{F=1}^n \sum_{n/(F+1)<k\le n/F} \Lambda(k)[1-(\tfrac nk-F)][1-\tfrac kn(\tfrac nk-F)] = \frac1n \sum_{F=1}^n F \sum_{n/(F+1)<k\le n/F} \Lambda(k)[(F+1)k-n].
$$
If we let $\psi(x) = \sum_{1\le n\le x} \Lambda(n)$, then the inner sum can be written as a Riemann-Stieltjes integral
$$
\sum_{n/(F+1)<k\le n/F} \Lambda(k)[(F+1)k-n] = \int_{n/(F+1)}^{n/F} [(F+1)x-n] \, d\psi(x),
$$
which after integration by parts equals
\begin{align*}
\sum_{n/(F+1)<k\le n/F} \Lambda(k)[(F+1)k-n] &= [(F+1)x-n]\psi(x) \bigg|_{n/(F+1)}^{n/F} - \int_{n/(F+1)}^{n/F} \psi(x) \tfrac d{dx}[(F+1)x-n] \,dx \\
&= \psi(\tfrac nF) - (F+1) \int_{n/(F+1)}^{n/F} \psi(x) \,dx.
\end{align*}
(And this formula, once suspected, can be proved in an elementary fashion without needing to use Riemann-Stieltjes integrals.) In summary, your left-hand sum equals
$$
\frac1n \sum_{F=1}^n F \bigg( \psi(\tfrac nF) - (F+1) \int_{n/(F+1)}^{n/F} \psi(x) \,dx \bigg).
$$
So far this is all elementary; and if you define $E(x) = \psi(x) - x$, then this becomes
\begin{multline*}
\frac1n \sum_{F=1}^n F \bigg( \tfrac nF - (F+1) \int_{n/(F+1)}^{n/F} x \,dx \bigg) + \frac1n \sum_{F=1}^n F \bigg( E(\tfrac nF) - (F+1) \int_{n/(F+1)}^{n/F} E(x) \,dx \bigg) \\
= \frac12 + \frac1n \sum_{F=1}^n F \bigg( E(\tfrac nF) - (F+1) \int_{n/(F+1)}^{n/F} E(x) \,dx \bigg)
\end{multline*}
after some easy evaluation.
However, I don't know how to proceed further without plugging in the Prime Number Theorem, say in the form $|E(x)| \le C(A) x/(\log x)^A$ for any $A>0$ and some constant $C(A)$ depending on $A$.