Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Wolfram|Alpha evaluates

$$2\%\%\%/2$$

to $$1×10^{-6},$$

as well as many other online (google) and offline calculators.

My question: Is it really so, and one can represent one millionth as $1\%\%\%$? (Or maybe it is kind of a bug?..)

Thank you for any opinions and suggestions!

share|improve this question
1  
It's interpreting $\%$ to mean "divided by $100$. Dividing by $100$ three times is the same as dividing by one million. –  Cameron Buie Oct 25 '12 at 17:33
1  
I would consider it incorrect but understandable. –  Ross Millikan Oct 25 '12 at 17:35
    
@RossMillikan: Funny, I just added an answer that says the opposite. :) –  Charles Oct 25 '12 at 17:36
    
@Charles: I would argue it is incorrect syntax, but that depends upon your parser. There are many cases in English where something is incorrect but understandable. Sometimes one is a better way to say it than the "correct" version. –  Ross Millikan Oct 25 '12 at 17:40
    
@RossMillikan: I think we're just giving the same answer from two different perspectives. It's grammatically incorrect but mathematically/syntactically correct. –  Charles Oct 25 '12 at 17:45

3 Answers 3

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Essentially all these interpret $\%$ as multiplication by a factor of $10^{-2}$ since $2 \% = 0.02$. Hence, $$2 \% \% = (0.02) \% = 0.0002 = 2 \times 10^{-4}$$

EDIT

I am not sure whether it is an abuse of notation. The way I interpret $\%$ is $\%: x \to \dfrac{x}{100}$. Hence, in my understanding it would be completely valid to think of $\% \%$ as a composition of the function $\%$ twice.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you Marvis, but my question is more about correctness of such notation. –  Oleg Trakhman Oct 25 '12 at 17:49
    
EDIT makes it clear. –  Oleg Trakhman Oct 26 '12 at 7:45

It is mathematically correct, but generally you shouldn't write it (for the same reason you shouldn't write "0.000002 million" in place of 2).

share|improve this answer
    
We often use "$.3$ million" instead of "three hundred thousand" (for example). It's certainly goofy to use "$.000002$ million" instead of just "$2$", but it's certainly acceptable. –  Cameron Buie Oct 25 '12 at 17:40

This is not correct usage. While "$2\%$ of $150$" is the same as $\frac2{100}\cdot 150=3$, this does not mean that we are allowed to abuse the percent notation like this with repeated percents.

One would also not say that $1^{\circ\circ}=\frac\pi{180}^\circ=\frac{\pi^2}{180^2}$.

share|improve this answer
    
I wouldn't use your degree example, either, but like it. –  Ross Millikan Oct 25 '12 at 17:41
    
Thank you Hagen! How do you think would it be good if I file a bug to Wolfram Alpha about that case? –  Oleg Trakhman Oct 25 '12 at 17:47
2  
@OlegTrakhman: But is it a bug? What I wrote was my personal understanding of the matter ("guts feeling"). Meanwhile I see that "even" Wikipedia does not support my view. It seems I need a refence, probably from outside math usage. ("We" mathematicians don't use percent anyway, it's just courtesy for them bankers and bookies ;) ) –  Hagen von Eitzen Oct 25 '12 at 18:22

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.