Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was just watching Strang's test review for Unit 1 and he made a comment about the null space in question 4. I want to check if it's generally true.

Given a matrix $A_{m\times n}$ over a field and it's reduce row echelon form, $R_{m\times n}$ such that we have

$\begin{bmatrix} I_{r\times r} & F_{r\times n-r} \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$

Where $r$ is rank(A), then do the non-zero rows of

$\begin{bmatrix} I_{r\times r} & -F_{r\times n-r} \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$

always form a basis for the null space?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

No; consider $F_{r\times n-r}=0$.

share|cite|improve this answer
So if I make the condition that none of $F$'s rows are $0$ then is it true? – Robert S. Barnes Oct 24 '12 at 9:52
@Robert: My advice would be to develop a greater taste for exploratory experimentation. How about $(1,1/2)$? – joriki Oct 24 '12 at 9:56
You mean $(1,1/2)$ as a column of $F$? – Robert S. Barnes Oct 24 '12 at 9:59
@Robert: No, as $A_{1\times2}$ and $R_{1\times2}$. – joriki Oct 24 '12 at 9:59
I'm not exactly sure what you mean there, but I've been experimenting with the case of $I_{2\times 2}$ and $F_{2\times 4}$ and it only seems to work when there is at least one entry in each row and column of $F$. I'm not sure of course if that would carry over to larger matrices. – Robert S. Barnes Oct 24 '12 at 10:09

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.