Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I want to evaluate the following: $$\lim_{r \rightarrow 0}\frac{-r^2}{2 \left(\sqrt{1-\frac{r^2}{4}}-1 \right)}$$

I look at the graph and see that it seems to be going to zero. This makes sense to me because if I replace r with zero this function is defined and continuous near zero and the value of the function is zero.

So, I think: $$\lim_{r \rightarrow 0}\frac{-r^2}{2 \left(\sqrt{1-\frac{r^2}{4}}-1 \right)}=0$$

But next I try something else I rationalize the denominator since this is a good technique for solving limits. $$\lim_{r \rightarrow 0}\frac{-r^2 \left(\sqrt{1-\frac{r^2}{4}}+1 \right)}{2 \left(1-\frac{r^2}{4}-1 \right)}$$

Then, $$\lim_{r \rightarrow 0}\frac{-r^2 \left(\sqrt{1-\frac{r^2}{4}}+1 \right)}{\frac{-r^2}{2}}$$ so... $$\lim_{r \rightarrow 0} 2 \left(\sqrt{1-\frac{r^2}{2}}+1 \right)=4$$

What have I done? How can rationalizing change the graph? My guess is that the denominator $2 \left(\sqrt{1-\frac{r^2}{2}}-1 \right)$ is "divisible by $r^2$ in some not obvious way?

I know my original reasoning was sloppy, (not a proof) but the fact that the graph shows a limit of zero has me very confused.

How do I avoid this error? Just always rationalize everything? Why would I do that?

share|cite|improve this question
I gave a +1 for "Why would I do that?" :) – Srivatsan Sep 2 '11 at 4:07
up vote 6 down vote accepted

It looks pretty clear to me that the limit is 4 from the graph:


Perhaps you mis-entered it on your graphing tool?

Beyond that, when $r=0$, the numerator of the expression is $-r^2=-0^2=0$ and the denominator is $2 \left(\sqrt{1-\frac{r^2}{4}}-1 \right)=2 \left(\sqrt{1-\frac{0^2}{4}}-1 \right)=2 \left(\sqrt{1}-1 \right)=0$—that is, the expression is of the form $\frac{0}{0}$, which is an indeterminate form, so it needs further investigation.

share|cite|improve this answer
I feel so relieved that this makes sense after all. – user4681 Feb 14 '11 at 7:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.