Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

It is well-known that any set $E \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ with positive outer measure contains a nonmeasurable subset $V$. I know that $0 < m^*(V) \le m^*(E)$. Nevertheless, my question is the following: given $r \in \mathbb{R}$ such that $r>0$, is there a nonmeasurable subset of $\mathbb{R}$ whose outer measure is exactly $r$?

Thank you in advance.

share|improve this question
5  
Take a Vitali nonmeasurable subset of $[0,1]$, and scale it appropriately. –  Arturo Magidin Feb 14 '11 at 2:33
2  
This is probably close enough to math.stackexchange.com/questions/14591/… to close as duplicate. Note however that this problem is a bit easier, because given a nonmeasurable set $V$ with finite outer measure $s\gt 0$, the set $\frac{r}{s}V=\{\frac{r}{s}\cdot x:x\in V\}$ is a nonmeasurable set with outer measure $r$. –  Jonas Meyer Feb 14 '11 at 2:35
    
Thank you Arturo and Jonas. It was really simple. –  ragrigg Feb 14 '11 at 6:18
1  
I'll put my and Jonas's answer as a Community Wiki answer so you can mark it as "accepted" and the question can be marked as answered, in case it doesn't get the votes to be closed. –  Arturo Magidin Feb 14 '11 at 14:42

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

On can take a Vitali nonmeasurable subset of $[0,1]$, which has positive and finite outer measure, and just scale it appropriately.

As Jonas points out, this is closely related to this previous question, but much easier.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.