Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X$ be an irreducible separated scheme of finite type over an algebraically closed field $k$. In the proof of Theorem 8.15 Hartshorne claims that for any closed point $x\in X$ we have $dim\mathcal{O}_{X,x}=dim X$. This is an exercise in Hartshorne in the case that X is integral, i.e. also reduced. But the proof i know does not work in this more general situation and i was not able to find this statement anywhere else. Does anyone know how this works in this case ?

share|improve this question
It is false in general. –  only Oct 22 '12 at 19:09
Could you give an example ? –  Dieter Meint Oct 22 '12 at 19:49
Sorry, I misread your question; I thought it was asking about removing the "of finite type over an algebraically closed field" condition. –  only Oct 22 '12 at 23:14

1 Answer 1

As the dimension can be computed locally, you can suppose $X$ is affine defined by a finitely generated $k$-algebra $A$. Let $N$ be the ideal of nilpotent elements of $A$. Let $m$ be the maximal ideal of $A$ corresponding to $x$.

Then $A/N$ defined an integral algebraic variety, and $m/N$ is a maximal ideal. Let $Y$ be the affine integral algebraic variety associated to $A/N$ and let $y$ be the point of $Y$ corresponding to $m/N$. Then $\dim Y=\dim X$ because the closed immersion $Y\to X$ is actually a homeomorphism (it is surjective). On the other hand, $O_{Y,y}=O_{X,x}/(NO_{X,x})$. Similarly to $Y$, we have $\dim Y=\dim O_{Y,y}=\dim O_{X,x}$. So $\dim X=\dim O_{X,x}$.

It is not necessary to suppose $k$ algebraically closed, and $X$ needs not separated.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.