Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The p-norm is given by $||x||_{p} = (\sum_{n=1}^{\infty }|x_{n}|^{p})^{1/p}$. For $0 < p < q$, it can be shown that $||x||_{p} \geq ||x||_{q}$ (1, 2). It appears that in $R^{n}$ a number of opposite inequalities can also be obtained. In fact, since all norms in a finite-dimensional vector space are equivalent, this must be the case. So far, I only found the following: $||x||_{1} \leq \sqrt n ||x||_{2}$(3), $||x||_{2} \leq \sqrt n ||x||_{\infty}$ (4). Geometrically, it is easy to see that opposite inequalities must hold in $R^{n}$. For instance, for n=2 and n=3 one can see that for $0 < p < q$, the spheres with radius $\sqrt n$ with $||\cdot||_{p}$ inscribe spheres with radius 1 with $||\cdot||_{q}$.

It is not hard to prove inequality (4). According to Wikipedia, inequality (3) follows directly from Cauchy-Schwarz, but I don't see how. For n=2 it is easily proven (see below), but not for n>2. So my question is:

  1. How can relation (3) be proven for arbitrary n?
  2. Can this be generalized into something of the form $||x||_{p} \leq C ||x||_{q}$ for arbitrary $0<p < q$?
  3. Do any of the relations also hold for infinite dimensional spaces, i.e. in $l^{p}$ spaces?


$||x||_{1}^{2} = |x_{1}|^2 + |x_{2}|^2 + 2|x_{1}||x_{2}| \leq |x_{1}|^2 + |x_{2}|^2 + (|x_{1}|^2 + |x_{2}|^2) = 2|x_{1}|^2 + 2|x_{2}|^2 = 2 ||x||_{2}^{2}$, hence $||x||_{1} \leq \sqrt 2 ||x||_{2}$. This works because $|x_{1}|^2 + |x_{2}|^2 \leq 2|x_{1}||x_{2}|$, but only because $(|x_{1}| - |x_{2}|)^2 \geq 0$, while for more than two terms $(|x_{1}| \pm |x_{2}| \pm \dotsb \pm |x_{n}|)^2 \geq 0$ gives an inequality that never gives the right signs for the cross terms.

share|cite|improve this question
Your first link (1) has exactly the equation you seek. Actually a version of Norberts excellent answer, generalized to measure spaces. – Thomas Ahle Mar 31 at 20:57
up vote 19 down vote accepted
  1. Using Cauchy–Schwarz inequality we get for all $x\in\mathbb{R}^n$ $$ \Vert x\Vert_1= \sum\limits_{i=1}^n|x_i|= \sum\limits_{i=1}^n|x_i|\cdot 1\leq \left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^n|x_i|^2\right)^{1/2}\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^n 1^2\right)^{1/2}= \sqrt{n}\Vert x\Vert_2 $$
  2. Such a bound does exist. Recall Hölder's inequality $$ \sum\limits_{i=1}^n |a_i||b_i|\leq \left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^n|a_i|^r\right)^{\frac{1}{r}}\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^n|b_i|^{\frac{r}{r-1}}\right)^{1-\frac{1}{r}} $$ Apply it to the case $|a_i|=|x_i|^p$, $|b_i|=1$ and $r=q/p>1$ $$ \sum\limits_{i=1}^n |x_i|^p= \sum\limits_{i=1}^n |x_i|^p\cdot 1\leq \left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^n (|x_i|^p)^{\frac{q}{p}}\right)^{\frac{p}{q}} \left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^n 1^{\frac{q}{q-p}}\right)^{1-\frac{p}{q}}= \left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^n |x_i|^q\right)^{\frac{p}{q}} n^{1-\frac{p}{q}} $$ Then $$ \Vert x\Vert_p= \left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^n |x_i|^p\right)^{1/p}\leq \left(\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^n |x_i|^q\right)^{\frac{p}{q}} n^{1-\frac{p}{q}}\right)^{1/p}= \left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^n |x_i|^q\right)^{\frac{1}{q}} n^{\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q}}=\\= n^{1/p-1/q}\Vert x\Vert_q $$ In fact $C=n^{1/p-1/q}$ is the best possible constant.
  3. For infinite dimensional case such inequality doesn't hold. For explanation see this answer.
share|cite|improve this answer
Could you please comment on why C is the best possible constant? – Arun Jun 10 '15 at 14:18
@Arun, because for $x=(1,1,1,\ldots,1)$ this bound is attained – Norbert Jun 10 '15 at 14:27
@Norbert: I'm trying to derive a similar bound for the case $p>q$. Any ideas about how to proceed ? – pikachuchameleon Jun 22 '15 at 12:19
@AshokVardhan what does "similar" mean? Do you want to prove something like $\Vert x\Vert_p \leq C\Vert x\Vert_q$ for $p>q$ ? – Norbert Jun 23 '15 at 14:24
@Norbert: Yes, by similar, I meant a bound that you mentioned in the above comment. Thanks. – pikachuchameleon Jun 23 '15 at 14:43

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.