Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

check the validity of the following argument: "if the rents of hotels in jammu are fixed or the prices of the commodities are reduced then the income of bussinessmen shall decrease. If the income of businessmen decrease then the farmer shall feel happy. The farmers never feel happy. Therefore the rents of the hotels are not fixed" .

share|cite|improve this question

Well, assume that the rents are fixed. What can you then deduce from the first setence? And, using that deduction, what does the second sentence then imply? Is that conclusion consistent with the assumption that the farmers aren't happy?

What you have here are implications $A \lor B \implies C$ and $C \implies D$. Which, by modus pones, implies $A \lor B \implies D$. Which is the same as $D \lor \lnot(A \lor B)$. If this propositions is to be true when $D$ is false, $\lnot (A \lor B)$ will have to be true. What does that tell you about $A$ and $B$?

(Here, $A$ means the rents are fixed, $B$ that the price of the commodities are reduced, $C$ that the income of businessman decreases, and $D$ that farmers are happy)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.