Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Since it is bounded and closed, it seems so. Massey's text says that

Theorem 5.1 [Algebraic Topology An Introduction] Any compact surface is homeomorphic to either a sphere or $n$-tori or the connected sum of $n$ projective planes.

But I cannot show annulus is homeomorphic to either one of them...

share|cite|improve this question

Theorem 5.1 refers to surfaces without boundary. The annulus is a surface with boundary.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.