Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I were standing in a equilateral triangle - How do I calculate the inverse of my position? Can it be done? It's easy inside a rectangle, but I can't think of how you would do it inside of a triangle.

For instance if I'm in one corner of a rectangle, I know the inverse of my position is the opposite corner. But with a triangle it is different. I suspect there must be a way to calculate an inverse, or maybe just the farthest point from any given point.

I'm working on a color theory in case it matters.

share|cite|improve this question

closed as unclear what you're asking by Mike Pierce, Claude Leibovici, G. Sassatelli, Fabian, Jon Mark Perry Jan 2 at 11:53

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Inverse of position? – rschwieb Oct 19 '12 at 19:04
Ah, you could use some transformation, like rotating $120^\circ$ around the center.. Is it a regular triangle at all? Or you can use reflections to a midline.. what would you prefer? – Berci Oct 19 '12 at 19:15
If any of the answeres below were useful to you, then you should upvote all answers you find useful and accept the one that was most useful to you. It is a way to show that you have found the answer to your question and it shows your appreciation. Now it seems like you still need help. If answers are not useful to you, then it helps if you say why not. This helps others to help you. For more information read this. – gebruiker Apr 21 at 11:18

This question is quite hard to answer, because we aren't provided with a satisfying definition of "inverse of a position". So in order for my answer to make sense I wil first have to introduce a definition. I will do this for a very general case, namely: for the boundary $\partial S$ of an $n$-dimenstional convex set $S$ in the Eucledian space $\mathbb R^n$. In the OP for example, $\partial S$ is a triangle.

Consider a point $x\in \partial S$ and any point $P\in\mathring S$. The inverse point of $x$ with respect to $P$ is now defined as the intesection between $\partial S$ and the line through $x$ and $P$, (which is not $x$ itself). Notation: $\mathfrak I_P(x)$.

The map $\mathfrak I_P:\partial S\to \partial S$ is now well-defined due to the convexness. It can even be extended to the whole of $\bar S$ in a very obvious way.

So loosely speaking, we are reflecting in the point $P$. Any interior point $P$ will do in fact.

In the OP's case we are considering an equilateral triangle. Now an equilateral triangle has one particular nice point (opinion based), which is of course its incentre. So a very natural choise would be to choose this point for $P$.

This somewhat answers the question, however as with any definition, the OP is free to make another one that suites his needs better. The most important thing for the OP to know is that the "inverse of a position" has no conventional definion in general. So in any such case one must make their own definition, check that it is well-defined and that is usefull.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.