Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $(K, <)$ be an order field, can I define the order "<" in $K$ ?

I know that $K \models 0<a \;$ if and only if there is $b$ in the real closure of $K$ such that $b*b = a$. Can I "interpret" the real closure of $K$ in $K$?

share|cite|improve this question
The precise result here is that if $K$ is an orderable field, and $a$ is an element of $K$ that is not a sum of squares, then there's an ordering of $K$ that makes $a$ negative. Thus the only ordered fields in which the order is determined by the field structure are those where every positive element is a sum of squares, like for example $\mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{R}$ but unlike the examples given in the answers. – Chris Eagle Oct 19 '12 at 15:23
Maybe I wasn't clear, the problem is not finding differents orders in a field. The question is if we have a fixed field K with an order < fixed, Is there a formula in the langague of rings who defines the order <? If this is not always the case, when is it? – Samy Oct 19 '12 at 16:09
Do you not understand that the existence of a field with two different orders on it proves this is impossible? – Chris Eagle Oct 19 '12 at 16:13
I don't see how it's impossible. For example, you have two different roots for a square, but in order fields, you can define a particular one. Likewise, having two orders on a field doesn't necesarily means you can't define a particular one. – Rafa Oct 21 '12 at 20:33

A slightly more convoluted solution than Hagen's:

Consider the field $K=\mathbb Q(t)$, any interpretation of $t$ as a transcendental real number will define an embedding of $\Bbb Q(t)$ into $\Bbb R$, and by that an ordering and real-closure. If we map $t=\pi$ and $t=-e$ we get that $t>0$ and $t<0$ respectively.

Hence, definability of the real-closure or the order is impossible.

share|cite|improve this answer

Consider $K=\mathbb Q[X]/(X^2-2)$. There are two orders on $K$, depending on if we map $X\mapsto\sqrt 2 $ or $X\mapsto-\sqrt 2$. Hence $<$ cannot be recovered from the field $K$ alone.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.