Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know that $\operatorname{Spec} \mathbb{C}[x]$ can be identified with the set $\mathbb{C}\cup *$, where $*$ is a generic point via the correspondence $$ \prod_{i}(x-a_i) \leftrightarrow \{a_i\}_i , \ \ \ \ (0)\leftrightarrow *. $$ This correspondence holds for any $\operatorname{Spec} k[x]$ with algebraic closed field $k$.

When $k$ is not algebraic closed, how should one understand $\operatorname{Spec} k[x]$?

share|cite|improve this question
This is a good exercise. What have you tried? – Qiaochu Yuan Oct 19 '12 at 1:26
Since polynomial does not decompose into linear factors over non-algebraic field $k$, there must exist correspondence between irreducible polynomial and points on $Spec k[x]$. – M. K. Oct 19 '12 at 1:30
The only prime ideals in $\mathbb{C}[x]$ are either the zero ideal or generated by a polynomial of the form $x-a$, as is true for $k[x]$ for any algebraically closed $k$. The correspondence above should read $(x-a) \leftrightarrow a, (0)\leftrightarrow *$. – Brad Oct 19 '12 at 1:56
Oh you are right, Brad. – M. K. Oct 19 '12 at 3:22
up vote 9 down vote accepted

You note correctly in a comment that the points of $\operatorname{Spec} k[x]$ correspond to (monic) irreducible polynomials, and you are correct that this can be identified with the set $k\cup\{*\}$ when $k$ is algebraically closed.

Suppose $\bar k$ is an algebraic closure of $k$. Then the inclusion $k[x]\to\bar k[x]$ induces a morphism $\pi:\operatorname{Spec} \bar k[x]\to\operatorname{Spec} k[x]$ which is surjective as a map of sets. If we take a point of $\operatorname{Spec} k[x]$ and think of it as a monic irreducible polynomial $p(x)$, the fibre of $\pi$ over that point is exactly the set of roots of $p$. For simplicity, let's assume that $k$ is a perfect field (e.g. it has characteristic zero or it's a finite field), so that the extension $\bar k/k$ is Galois. The Galois group $G:=\operatorname{Gal}(\bar k/k)$ acts on $\operatorname{Spec} \bar k[x]\simeq \bar k\cup\{*\}$ in the obvious way (fixing the point $*$), and the fibres of $\pi$ are exactly the orbits of this action, so we can think of $\operatorname{Spec} k[x]$ as the quotient $(\bar k\cup\{*\})/G$.

For example, if $k=\mathbb{R}$, we can think of $\operatorname{Spec}\mathbb{R}[x]$ as something like what we get by taking the complex plane $\mathbb{C}$ and identifying complex conjugates, i.e. folding it over on itself across the real line. (That, along with the generic point $*$.)

share|cite|improve this answer

Let $\bar k$ be an algebraic closure of $k$. Let $G = Aut(\bar k/k)$. $\bar k/G$ be the set of $G$-orbits. We will show that there exists a canonical bijection $Spec$ $k[x] \rightarrow \bar k/G\cup \{*\}$.

Let $Y =$ $Spec$ $k[x] - \{(0)\}$. It suffices to prove that there exists a canonical bijection $\psi\colon Y \rightarrow \bar k/G$. Let $p \in Y$. There exists a unique monic irreducible polynomial $f(x) \in k[x]$ such that $p = (f(x))$. Let $S$ be the set of roots of $f(x)$ in $\bar k$. It is clear that $S$ is $G$-stable. Let $\alpha, \beta \in S$. There exists a $k$-isomorphism $k(\alpha) \rightarrow k(\beta)$ transforming $\alpha$ to $\beta$. It can be extended to a $k$-automorphism of $\bar k$. Hence there exists $\sigma \in G$ such that $\sigma(\alpha) = \beta$. Hence $S \in \bar k/G$. Hence we get a map $\psi\colon Y \rightarrow \bar k/G$ such that $\psi(p) = S$. Clearly $\psi$ is injective.

Let $T \in \bar k/G$. Let $\alpha \in T$. Let $f(x)$ be the minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ over $k$. Clearly $\psi((f(x)) = T$. Hence $\psi$ is surjective.

share|cite|improve this answer
Can you say more about why $G$ acts transitively on $S$, when $\bar{k}$ is possibly non-separable over $k$? – Zhen Lin Oct 19 '12 at 11:16
@ZhenLin I added an explanation for it. – Makoto Kato Oct 19 '12 at 11:51

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.