Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $M$ be a surface with Riemannian metric $g$. Recall that an orthonormal framing of $M$ is an ordered pair of vector fields $(E_1,E_2)$ such that $g(E_i,E_j)=\delta_{ij}$. Prove that an orthonormal framing exists iff $M$ is orientable and $M$ admits a nowhere vanishing vector field $X$.

Remark: It's obvious in $\mathbb{R}^3$, but how to formally justify it? The definition for orientabily: $M$ is orientable if there exists an atlas $(u_{\alpha},M_{\alpha})_{\alpha}$ such that $\mathrm{det}(\mathrm{d}(u_{\beta}\circ u_{\alpha}^{-1}))>0$, for each $(\alpha,\beta)$ such that $M_{\alpha} \cap M_{\beta} \neq \Phi$

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Assume $M$ is orientable and admits a nowhere vanishing vector field $X$. Define $E_1 = \frac{X}{|X|}$. Since $M$ is two dimensional, at each $p \in M$, there are only two choices of tangent vectors that are orthogonal to $(E_1)_p$ and of length $1$. The orientability will help you choose one consistently. Fix an oriented atlas. Take a local oriented coordinate system around $p$ with coordinates $(x_1, x_2)$. First, show that you can solve the problem locally, with the correct orientation. That is, show explicitly that you can define $E_2$ in a neighborhood of $p$, such that $E_2$ is of length 1, orthogonal to $E_1$ and that $(E_1, E_2)$ are positively oriented. Then, show that given two intersecting oriented coordinate system neighborhoods, your definition agrees on the intersection (because the choice of $(E_1, E_2)$ to be positively oriented resolves the sign ambiguity).

For the other direction, given a framing $E_i$, take a coordinate neighborhood $U$ around $p \in M$ with coordinates $(x_1, x_2)$, represent $E_i = e^j_i \frac{\partial}{\partial x^j}$ and check whether $\det (e_i^j) > 0$ (whether the coordinate system $x^i$ "thinks" that $E_i$ are positively oriented). If not, replace $(x_1, x_2)$ with $(x_2, x_1)$. This gives you an atlas. Check that this atlas is consistently oriented.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.