Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I must solve following inequation:


Now the text says that I have to solve the inequation "direct" without solving the according equations.

What does that mean?

I would say that I have to multiply by $(1-2x)$ then I get

$x-3<0$ and

$L_1 = [x \le 2]$

$L_2 = [x >0] $

but I have the feeling that I'm doing something wrong. Especially I don't understand what the paragraph about solving the inequation "direct" means. Could someone maybe explain that to me?

share|cite|improve this question

If you mulitply an inequality by a negative number, it will exchange the signs $>$ and $<$ (because for example $1<2$ but $-1>-2$...) So it is not the best to multiply by the denominator unless you're sure it is positive!

I think, by 'direct', they meant as starting point to think about, when a fraction $\displaystyle\frac AB$ will be negative in general.. (If $A>0$ and $B<0$ or $A<0$ and $B>0$.)

share|cite|improve this answer

Besides to above solutions see the table below:

enter image description here

It shows that your desire interval would be $(-\infty, 1/2)\cup (3,+\infty)$

share|cite|improve this answer

Since $$\frac{x-3}{1-2x}=\frac{(x-3)(1-2x)}{(1-2x)(1-2x)} \ \ \ x\neq \frac{1}{2}$$

and $(1-2x)(1-2x)=(1-2x)^2>0$


We allowed multiply that inequality by $(1-2x)^2$ and get,


Can you solve that?

share|cite|improve this answer
Yes, I can solve that. But why do we have to "allow" the multiplication? Can't I just look at the fraction and see when it is 0 and these are the borders for my solution? – Lukas Plommer Oct 17 '12 at 9:38
Is it possible that the solution is L = {x<(1/2) v x>3} ? Is that a valid way of writing the solution for an inequation? – Lukas Plommer Oct 17 '12 at 9:44
Solution: $x>3 \ \ \text{or} \ \ x<\frac{1}{2}$ – Salech Alhasov Oct 17 '12 at 9:49
We multiply the numerator and denominator by $(1-2x)$, therefor, the sign is not changing. – Salech Alhasov Oct 17 '12 at 9:55
@LukasPlommer: yes, $L=\{x \mid x<1/2 \, \lor \, x>3\}$. – Berci Oct 17 '12 at 10:55

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.