Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm working my way through Stein and Shakarchi's Real Analysis, and I'm having some trouble figuring this exercise out.

Given the function $K_\delta$ that satisfies the normal approximation to the identity properties

$|K_\delta(x)| \leq A\delta^{−d}$ for all $\delta > 0$

$|K_\delta(x)| \leq A\delta/|x|^{d+1}$ for all $\delta > 0$

but

$\int_{-\infty}^\infty{K_\delta(x)dx}= 0$ for all $\delta > 0$

prove that if $f$ is integrable on $R^d$ then $(f*K_\delta)(x) \to 0$ as $\delta \to 0$ for a.e $x$.

Is it enough to use $\int_{R^d}(f*K_\delta)(x)=\int_{R^d}f\int_{R^d}K_\delta$? The domain of integration is confusing me - integrating over $R^d$ the same as integrating over $-\infty$ to $\infty$ in this case, correct? Then $\int_{R^d}(f*K_\delta)(x)=0$. Am I missing something?

Thanks for the help.

share|cite|improve this question
    
Integrating over $\mathbb{R}^d$ is the same as integration over $(-\infty,\infty)=\mathbb{R}$ if and only if $d=1$. If the domain of integration confuses you, you should familiarize yourself with integration in $\mathbb{R}^n$ first. – Your Ad Here Oct 16 '12 at 18:15
    
Ohh okay duh. Thanks for clarifying that. It was not conceptual confusion (at least not to the extent you thought) but notational confusion, since usually the normalization was done over $R^d$. So I could do $\int_{R^d}fdx(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{R^{d-1}}K_\delta (x)dxdy)$ and use Fubini? – ryjm Oct 16 '12 at 19:08
1  
Okay I thought about it a bit, and I think I found an easy way. All I have to do is take any other approximation to the identity function $J_\delta$ and define a new function $G_\delta=J_\delta + K_\delta$. Then it's clear that $G_\delta$ satisfies all the conditions for a normal approximation to the identity function, so $G_\delta * f \to f$. But $J_\delta * f \to f$ by construction, and since $K_\delta * f = (G_\delta * f) - (J_\delta * f)$ we must have that $K_\delta * f \to 0$! – ryjm Oct 16 '12 at 22:34

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.