Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It's been a few years since I became done with my university studies so I don't recall all the details very well. Today, I got into a discussion with my boss, also engineer, regarding computation of an area of a circle (not really so, but that's the significant point).

We tried to set up a double integral as follows:

$A = \iint 1 dr df, r \in [0, R], f \in [0, 2 pi]$

but apparently all the math since a few centuries has been very wrong because we "discovered" that the area is:

$A = \iint dr df = R \int df = 2 \pi R, $

which, of course, is the circumference. :)

My questions are those.

  1. Should I not integrate the function 1 over the specified area?
  2. What did we assume wrongly?
  3. Can I have a hint on how to integrate myself to the correct expression?

(Also, since I realize that I may be jumped with a gazillion of accusation yelling "homework", I can assure that I'm not a student - I can be Googled, Linked-in etc.)

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted
  1. You should integrate 1, because $S=\int\limits_S1d\sigma$ In this notation, $d\sigma$ is a "surface element" when integrating over areas (think of calculating a weight of a plate of area S with constant specific density of $1kg/cm^2$ - every little piece of a plate weights $1d\sigma$ kg ).
  2. You assumed that in polar coordinate system $d\sigma=drd\phi$ which is wrong.
  3. Figure out a correct form of $d\sigma$ in polar coordinates, given that in cartesian coordinates it is $d\sigma=dxdy$ and $x=r\cos\phi$, $y=r\sin\phi$
share|cite|improve this answer
Splendid reply (answer to the actual questions with exactly corresponding information) BUT too explicit info. I wanted to kill the beast myself... :( Thanks guys, anyway! I've been missing mathematics the last few years... Maybe I should get back and do Ph.D... – Konrad Viltersten Oct 16 '12 at 15:01

You have to take the Jacobian determinant in to account. (Example 3)

Your integral should by $\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^Rr\,dr\,df$.

share|cite|improve this answer

The problem you have is that you defined your integral over two variables, r and f which are not the classical x,y euclidean coordinates. This is a change of variables. You therefore have to add a term in the integral corresponding to the determinant of the Jacobian of this change of variables.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.