Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Assume $A\in M_{n}(\mathbb{R})$ is diagonalizable.

For practical reasons it is sometimes for convenient to work with $\alpha A$ instead of A ($\alpha\in\mathbb{R}$),

For example if $$A=\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1\\ -\frac{1}{8} & \frac{3}{4} \end{pmatrix}$$ then working with $$8A=\begin{pmatrix}0 & 8\\ -1 & 6 \end{pmatrix}$$ can be more convenient.

If I wish to find $P,D$ s.t. $P^{-1}AP=D$ then I can do so by calculating the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of $A$.

My question is this: If I work with $B=\alpha A$ and find the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of $B$ then I have it that the same $P$ will diagonalize $A$ and $B$ and the eigenvalues of $B$ are the eigenvalues of $A$ multiplied by $\alpha$ ?

My reasoning is that if $Av=\lambda v$ then $\alpha Av=\alpha\lambda v$ so it's the same $v$ but the eigenvalue of $B$ is $\alpha\lambda$, am I correct ?

share|cite|improve this question
You had better not take $\alpha=0$. But otherwise, its fine. – Marc van Leeuwen Oct 16 '12 at 8:26
Why the downvote ? – Belgi Oct 19 '12 at 10:12
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Yes, what you said is correct.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.