Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a question concerning a calculus "trick" sometimes used in stochastic calculus (e.g. in the Book on Arbitrage Theory in Cont. Time of Bjoerk). There they do the following in the proof of Prop. 29.6:

$\frac{1}{B_t}dF_t=h_tdW_t$, multiply on both sides with $B_t$ to obtain $dF_t=B_th_tdW_t$. The step seems rather obvious. $B_t$ is a prob. a finite variation process. The question is: Can one apply this also in general?

I.e. $F$ is a solution to

$dM_t = F_td\frac{1}{S_t}$ iff it solves $S_tdM_t = S_tF_t \frac{1}{S_t}$

$M$ depends on F, but is a local martingale. Say $F_td\frac{1}{S_t}$ is a (strict) local martingale. Multiplying $S$ gives $S_t F_td\frac{1}{S_t}$ which might well be a true martingale. So this transformation can have significant impact. Is it allowed?

Thank you for you attention!

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Written out in detail, the statement $\frac{1}{B_t}dF_t = h_tdW_t$ means

$$ \int_0^t \frac{1}{B_s}dF_s = \int_0^t h_s dW_s \qquad\textrm{for all }t\ge0, $$ so that $B^{-1}\cdot F = h\cdot W$, in process notation, where $(h\cdot W)_t = \int_0^t h_sdW_s$, et cetera. Using the composition rule for stochastic integration, namely $K\cdot (H\cdot X) = KH\cdot X$ (see for example Theorem II.19 of Protters book), yields that the above equality implies $F = B \cdot B^{-1} \cdot F = B\cdot (h\cdot W) = Bh\cdot W$, meaning $dF_t = B_th_tdW_t$. Whether $B$ has finite variation is irrelevant, it suffices that $B$ for example is predictable and locally bounded (this is in particular the case if $B$ is continuous). If $B$ is everywhere positive, the other implication holds as well, as we may then simply use the composition rule with $B^{-1}$.

By similar arguments in the general case, the following result holds: Let $X$ and $Y$ be some semimartingales, and let $H$ be some positive, predictable and locally bounded process. It then holds that

$$X = Y \qquad \textrm{if and only if}\qquad H \cdot X = H \cdot Y$$

or, in other words,

$$dX_t = dY_t \qquad \textrm{if and only if}\qquad H_tdX_t = H_tdY_t.$$

Hope this answers your question.

share|cite|improve this answer
Well, it does. Thank you. – user13655 May 16 '13 at 16:46

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.