# Having the same equivalent class imply that the elements are equivalent?

You have given that the equivalence class of $x$ and the equivalence class of $y$ is equal. $[x]=[y]$. Does this imply that $x\sim y$? If yes, how do I prove it, if no, what sort of counter-examples can I give?

-
After you ask a question here, if you get an acceptable answer, you should "accept" the answer by clicking the check mark ✓ next to it. This scores points for you and for the person who answered your question. If you don't do this, people are less likely to answer your later questions. You can find out more about accepting answers here: How do I accept an answer?, Why should we accept answers?, How does accept rate work?. –  Julian Kuelshammer Oct 15 '12 at 20:35

By definiton of the equivalence class of some element, we have $[x] = \{z \in X \mid z \sim x\}$ By reflexivity of $\sim$, we have $x \in [x]$. So $y \in [y] = [x]$, that is $y \in [x]$, so by definition of $[x]$, $y \sim x$.
Yes. If $[a]$ and $[b]$ are equivalence classes, then either $[a]=[b]$ or $[a]\cap[b] = \varnothing$.
Equivalence classes always form a partition of the underlying set: every element $x$ lies in exactly one equivalence class.