Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Assume all the matrices I discuss about are $N \times N$. Consider any two hermitian matrices $A_1$ and $A_2$ which are indefinite. The question is, In general, for any $A_1$ and $A_2$, does there exist any positive number $t$ such that equation

\begin{align} (tA_1+(1-t)A_2)x=0 \end{align}

has a non-zero vector $x$ as a solution.

share|cite|improve this question
It can happen; take $A_1=I$, $A_2=-I$ and $t=\frac12$. – Brian M. Scott Oct 14 '12 at 11:25
@dineshdileep You should add traceless... – draks ... Oct 14 '12 at 11:31
@Brian M.Scott Yes I know it can happen. In fact, if $A_1$ and $A_2$ commute, it will definitely happen. I am looking for an answer in general. – dineshdileep Oct 14 '12 at 11:51
It might be helpful to others to make that clearer in the question. – Brian M. Scott Oct 14 '12 at 12:01
Consider when $A_1$ and $A_2$ are positive definite. – chaohuang Oct 14 '12 at 14:39
up vote 1 down vote accepted

If divide through by $t$ and set $s=\frac{1}{t}$ it is the generalized eigenvector problem with matrices $M = A_1 -A_2$ and $A_2$

\begin{align} (tA_1+(1-t)A_2)x &=0 \\ (tA_1-tA_2 + A_2)x &=0 \\ (t(A_1-A_2) + A_2)x &=0 \\ (A_1-A_2 + sA_2)x &=0 \\ (M + sA_2)x &=0 \\ \end{align}

The generalized eigenvector problem does have solutions in general. Could also write it as $$(A_2 + tM)\mathbf{x}=\mathbf{0}$$

I would like to point out that the equation you have is the basis for an argument using continuity (the eigenvalues of a matrix vary continuously with the entries). Look at $t$ at $0$ and $1$.

For $t=0$, the equation is $A_2 x =0$ and the question is if $A_2$ is singular ($x \ne 0$ solves it only for singular $A_2$).

I realize that you are interested in positive $t$, so either consider $t$ very small (and thus consider an approximate solution), or look now at $t=1$. Does $A_1 x = 0$ have a solution?

Now look at $t \to \infty$, in that case $(A_1-A_2)x=0$ is the question.

I would consider Sylvester's law of inertia if the matrices were real symmetric (the theorem is for real symmetric only). It is much easier to find a diagonalized congruence rather than a similarity, and the law states that the inertia is constant under congruency (inertia is the triplet number, number of positive eigenvalues, the number of $0$ eigenvalues, and number of negative eigenvalues). If congruency were preserving the inertia with hermitian (not a theorem as far as I know) then you would look at the inertia of the different matrices from $t=0$, $t=1$, and $t \to \infty$. If their inertia differs, then there is some point at which a positive crosses to be negative, and thus some point of singularity, giving the $t$ at which the equation has a solution.

But since you asked about hermitian indefinite, that is the difference...

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks!!, I came along this direction. Does it hold even if the matrices are singular or say real only?. I know specific examples where a solution doesn't exist when the matrices are real. Even then, the solution is helpful that you connected it to the generalized eigen value problem. – dineshdileep Oct 15 '12 at 2:13
@dineshdileep yes there is quite a difference if the matrices are real only, see my edit, which addresses the singular matrices question as well. – adam W Oct 22 '12 at 14:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.