Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have thousands of data files which are essential DFT data of plots such as this:

enter image description here

And a DFT of the plot with a "Hard" threshold of 0.9 gives me:

enter image description here

This DFT is just the left top corner of the DFT data with the DC value removed.

The reason I used a threshold value of 0.9 is because in the DFT coefficient matrix that I plotted above, most of the values of very small (~10^-4) and there are maybe 1-2 values that influence the DFT and they are above 0.9

However, it was suggested that I use a Frobenius Norm of my DFT data to threshold my plots.

Why is that? I can't use a Frob. norm as a threshold because it is a very large value ~100 and my DFT coefficient matrix is populated with numbers <100 generally

Should I just divide my DFT data with the Frob. norm? I have read the following posts 1 2 3

~Concerned Mechanical engineer

share|cite|improve this question
How are you defining the Frobenius norm? – Manos Oct 13 '12 at 17:38
I am not. Mathematica is. I just plan on using the Frob Norm for my work. – drN Oct 13 '12 at 17:38

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.