Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was reading the lemma 4.1 in "J.M.Lee - Introduction to smooth manifolds" which says that given a smooth $n$-manifold $M$, then the tangent bundle $TM$ is a smooth $2n$-manifold.

If $\pi: TM\rightarrow M$ is the natural projection, given an atlas $\mathcal A=\{(U_i,\phi_i)\}$ on $M$, we can define a collection of sets $\{\pi^{-1}(U_i)\}$ and a collection of functions $\widetilde\phi_i:\pi^{-1}(U_i)\rightarrow \mathbb R^{2n}$ which both satisfy the lemma 1.23 namely the construcion lemma for smooth manifolds.

More precisely, on $TM$ is defined the topology having as base the set
$$B=\{\widetilde{\phi_i}^{-1}(V)\; \textrm{for all $i$}:\,\textrm{$V$ is open in $\mathbb R^{2n}$}\}$$

I have some problems to prove that $TM$ is Hausdorff: clearly it is enough to show that given two distinct point $P=(p,X),Q=(q,Y)\in TM$, either then exist some $\pi^{-1}(U_i)$ containing both $P$ and $Q$ or there exist disjoint sets $\pi^{-1}(U_i)$ and $\pi^{-1}(U_j)$ with $P\in \pi^{-1}(U_i)$ and $Q\in \pi^{-1}(U_j)$. If $P$ and $Q$ lie in the same fiber of $\pi$ it is all clear, but if they lie in different fibres than $\pi (P)=p\neq q=\pi(Q)$ and J.M. Lee says

there exist disjoint smooth coordinate domains $U,V$ for $M$ such that $p\in U$ and $q\in V$

Why is this true? $M$ is Hausdorff, but open sets of $M$ are not the smooth coordinate domains (the latter form a subset of the former)!

share|cite|improve this question
Given disjoint open sets $U, V \subset M$ with $p \in U$ and $q \in V$, you can find subsets $U' \subseteq U$ and $V' \subseteq V$ which are smooth coordinate domains for $M$ and $p \in U'$, $q \in V'$. Let $U$ and $V$ be such open sets and let $X$ be a coordinate neighbourhood for $p$ and $Y$ a coordinate neighbourhood for $q$. Then set $U' = U \cap X$ and $V' = V \cap Y$. – Michael Albanese Oct 13 '12 at 15:41
up vote 1 down vote accepted

First, let me fix some terminology (taken from Lee's book).

Let $M$ be a smooth $n$-dimensional manifold. A coordinate chart on $M$ is a pair $(U, \varphi)$ where $U$ is an open subset of $M$ and $\varphi : U \to \tilde{U}$ is a homeomorphism from $U$ to an open subset $\tilde{U} = \varphi(U) \subset \mathbb{R}^n$. The set $U$ is called a coordinate domain.

Now to the situation at hand. As $M$ is Hausdorff, and $p \neq q$, there are disjoint open sets $U, V \subset M$ with $p \in U$ and $q \in V$. As you note, there is no guarantee that $U$ and $V$ will be coordinate domains. While that is true, we can take them to be coordinate domains without loss of generality. Let $(X, \varphi)$, $(Y, \psi)$ be charts (i.e. $X, Y$ are coordinate domains) with $p \in X$ and $q \in Y$ (note, we do not require $X$ and $Y$ to be disjoint).

Claim: The sets $U' = U\cap X$, $V' = V\cap Y$ are coordinate domains with $p \in U'$ and $q \in V'$.

As $U'$ and $V'$ are open, and the restriction of a homeomorphism to an open subset is a homeomorphism, $(U', \varphi|_{U'})$ and $(V', \psi|_{V'})$ are charts; that is, $U'$ and $V'$ are coordinate domains. As $p \in U$ and $p\in X$, $p \in U'$; likewise, as $q \in V$ and $q \in Y$, $q \in V'$.

So, without loss of generality, we can take $U$ and $V$ to be coordinate domains (if they aren't, pass to subsets $U' \subseteq U$, $V' \subseteq V$ which are, and call these sets $U$ and $V$ respectively).

share|cite|improve this answer

$TX= \{(p,v) : p \in X, v \in T_{p}X \}$ since $X$ and $T_{p}(X)$ are connected Hausdorff spaces ( $T_{p}(X)$ is a subspace of manifold $X$ ) Hence $TX$ is a connected Hausdorff space

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.