Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Doing some exercises from a mathematical finance book, I got stuck at the following point. It is a purely probability question. Let $S_t^1 = \sigma W_t$, where $W_t$ is a brownian motion and $\sigma>0$ a parameter. Furthermore let $K>0$ also be a positive constant. I want to compute the price of a call option under $Q$, i.e.

$$E_Q[(S_T^1-K)^+|\mathcal{F}_t]$$

So far I was able to do this: Let $A:=\{S^1_T>K\}$

$$E_Q[(S_T^1-K)^+|\mathcal{F}_t]=E_Q[S_T^1\mathbf1_A|\mathcal{F}_t]-KE_Q[\mathbf1_A|\mathcal{F}_t]$$

Writing $S^1_T=S_t^1+\sigma(W_T-W_t)$ leads to

$$\sigma E_Q[(W_T-W_t)\mathbf1_A|\mathcal{F}_t]+(S^1_t-K)E_Q[\mathbf1_A|\mathcal{F}_t]$$

Now here is the point, where I got stuck. I know $(W_T-W_t)$ is independent of $\mathcal{F}_t$ but I do not see if $A\in \mathcal{F}_t$. Or how else should I simplify this?

share|improve this question
What is $T$ here? You also have to use $B:=\{\sigma W_t>K\}$ (then $(S_t^1-K)^+$ will appear). – Davide Giraudo Oct 13 '12 at 15:14
@DavideGiraudo $T$ should be a fixed time horizon, $T\ge t$. – hulik Oct 14 '12 at 12:02

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Here is a general result.

Let $\xi$ and $\eta$ denote two random variables on a given probability space $(\Omega,\mathcal F,\mathbb P)$, $\mathcal G\subseteq\mathcal F$ any sigma-algebra and $u$ any nonnegative function. Assume that $\xi$ is $\mathcal G$-measurable and that $\eta$ is independent of $\mathcal G$. Then, $\mathbb E(u(\xi,\eta)\mid \mathcal G)=v(\xi)$, where $v:x\mapsto\mathbb E(u(x,\eta))$.

Applying this result to $\xi=W_t$, $\eta=W_T-W_t$, $\mathcal G=\mathcal F_t$ and $u(x,y)=(\sigma(x+y)-K)^+$ yields the formula $\mathbb E((\sigma W_T-K)^+\mid \mathcal F_t)=v(W_t)$ with $v:x\mapsto\mathbb E((\sigma\sqrt{T-t}\cdot\zeta+\sigma x-K)^+)$, where $\zeta$ is a standard normal random variable. Thus, $$ v(x)=\sigma\sqrt{T-t}\cdot g\left(\frac{\sigma x-K}{\sigma\sqrt{T-t}}\right), $$ where, for every $z$, $$ g(z)=\mathbb E((\zeta+z)^+)=z\Phi(z)+\varphi(z),\qquad\varphi(z)=\frac{\mathrm e^{-z^2/2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}},\quad\Phi(z)=\int_{-\infty}^z\varphi(t)\,\mathrm dt. $$ Edit: (This is to answer a question asked in the comments.) $$ \mathbb E(\zeta;\zeta\gt-z)=\int_{-z}^{+\infty}t\varphi(t)\mathrm dt=\left[-\varphi(t)\right]^{+\infty}_{-z}=\varphi(-z)=\varphi(z). $$

share|improve this answer
Thanks for your answer. I know this result and I also wanted to use it! That's the reason why I asked if $A\in\mathcal{F}_t$. But I defined the wrong variables. However there is one point which I do not get: $E[(\zeta+z)^+]=z\Phi(z)+\phi(z)$. I did the calculation and the term $z\Phi(z)$ is coming from $zP[\zeta> -z]$. But why is $E[\zeta\mathbf1_{\{\zeta > -z\}}]=\phi(z)$? – hulik Oct 14 '12 at 11:59
Because $t\varphi(t)=-\varphi'(t)$. (Of course, $A$ is not in $\mathcal F_t$ as soon as $t\lt T$, one cannot predict with certainty whether $W_T\geqslant K/\sigma$ or not, using only the path $(W_s)_{s\leqslant t}$.) – Did Oct 14 '12 at 13:14
Sorry for bothering you, but how does $t\varphi (t)=-\varphi^`(t)$ imply $E[\zeta\mathbf1_{\{\zeta>-z\}}]=\varphi(z)$ ? – hulik Oct 14 '12 at 13:36
See Edit. $ $ $ $ – Did Oct 14 '12 at 13:45
thanks so much! I did very bad mistake in reasoning. – hulik Oct 14 '12 at 16:08

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.