Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Find $$\lim\limits_{x \to \infty}\frac{2^x}{3^{x^2}}$$ I can only reason with this intuitively. since $3^{x^2}$ grows much faster than $2^x$ the limit as $x \to \infty$ of $f$ must be 0.

Is there a more rigorous way to show this?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Rewriting the fraction as $$\frac{e^{x \ln 2}}{e^{x^2 \ln 3}} = e^{x \ln 2 - x^2 \ln 3}$$ may also help you (although perhaps no more than the other answers given already).

share|cite|improve this answer
No, that's good. Factoring x in the exponent gives $\lim\limits_{x \to \infty} x(\ln(2) - x\ln(3)) = \infty \times - \infty $. Then you get $e^{-\infty} = 0$. Is that right? – bobobobo Feb 9 '11 at 2:46
That's certainly one way to think about the exponent, although I'm not sure how rigourous multiplying infinities is (and by that I mean I'm not sure if it is, not that it isn't, since it makes very much sense). I would be more comfortable factoring out an $x^2$ from the exponent instead and seeing what happens. – Arpon Feb 9 '11 at 2:52
Yeah, that was the only thing I was unsure about. But I considered it as just sign mults. I can't confirm if that's wrong. – bobobobo Feb 9 '11 at 2:55
The direct way to go here is by passing through a 'limit of a composition is the composition of the limit'-type of argument. – Gerben Feb 9 '11 at 10:08

How about comparison to $\displaystyle{\frac{2^x}{3^x}=\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)^x}$?

share|cite|improve this answer
This is nice also. So would it go $\lim\limits_{x \to \infty}(\frac{2}{3})^x\frac{1}{3^x} = 0 \times 0$. I know that $(\frac{2}{3})^x$ should go to $0$ for big x because the base of the exponent is less than 1, but what's the hard and fast rule that lets us say that? – bobobobo Feb 9 '11 at 2:53
@bobobobo: You have $0\lt$ your expression $\leq \frac{2^x}{3^x}\to 0$, showing that your expression goes to zero. There are a number of ways to see that $a^x$ goes to zero when $0\lt a\lt 1$. Since I see you like logs from another comment, notice that $\log(a^x)=x\log(a)\to -\infty$ because $\log(a)\lt 0$. Or notice that $y\gt x\Rightarrow a^y/a^x=a^{y-x}<1$, so $a^x$ is decreasing and positive, hence must have a limit, and since $\lim a^x = \lim a^{x+1}=a\lim a^x$, this limit must be $0$. – Jonas Meyer Feb 9 '11 at 3:01
+1 This is the way to go imo. Just notice that $(2/3)^x\to 0$ and notice that $3^{x^2}$ goes to infinity faster than $3^x$. – Myself Feb 9 '11 at 12:22

Hint: $2^x \lt 3^x$ for sufficiently large $x$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Yes.. so $2^x << 3^{x^2}$ for sufficiently large x as well.. is that a good enough argument? – bobobobo Feb 9 '11 at 2:13
That is not what I was going for! Only apply that to the numerator and see the fraction you get... – Aryabhata Feb 9 '11 at 2:17
Ok, $2^x < 3^x$, so write $\lim\limits_{x \to \infty}\frac{3^x}{3^{x^2}} > \lim\limits_{x \to \infty}\frac{2^x}{3^{x^2}}$, then $\lim\limits_{x \to \infty}\frac{1}{3^x} \to 0$. So it works because we established an upper bound that goes to 0? Why is that good enough? How do we nail down the $3^x$ numerator'd equation to the $2^x$ numerator'd equation? – bobobobo Feb 9 '11 at 2:30
@bobobobo: Note $\frac{3^x}{3^{x^2}} = \frac{1}{3^{x^2-x}}$ and $x^2-x \rightarrow \infty$ and $x \rightarrow \infty$ – user17762 Feb 9 '11 at 2:37

How about rewriting $\frac{2^x}{3^{x^2}}$ as $\frac{2^x}{3^x3^{x^2-x}}=(\frac{2}{3})^x\cdot\frac{1}{3^{x^2-x}}$?

share|cite|improve this answer

After so many equivalent examples one more should not be missed because of its form. Here we get the numerator constant and keep the notation in powers of 2 and 3. Denote $ ß=\frac{\ln(2)}{\ln(3)} $ Then $$ \frac{2^x}{3^{x^2}}=3^{ßx-x^2}=3^{(ß/2)²-(x-\fracß2)^2} = \frac{2^{ß/4}}{3^{(x-ß/2)^2}} $$ where the numerator is constant. We see also, that the denominator is minimal if $x=ß/2$ and the whole expression is maximal by the exponent $ßx-x^2$ of the second term, its first derivative $ß-2x$ (which is zero at $x=ß/2$) and its second derivative $-2$ which is negative and shows, that the whole expression has a maximum there.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.