Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The Pieri formula gives a decomposition

$$\textrm{Sym}^d V \otimes \textrm{Sym}^d V = \bigoplus \mathbb{S}_{(d+a, d-a)}V,$$

the sum over $0\leq a \leq d$. The left-hand side decomposes into a direct sum of $\textrm{Sym}^2(\textrm{Sym}^d V)$ and $\bigwedge^2(\textrm{Sym}^d V)$. Show that, in fact,

$\textrm{Sym}^2(\textrm{Sym}^d V)=\mathbb{S}_{(2d,0)}V\bigoplus \mathbb{S}_{(2d-2,2)}V\bigoplus \mathbb{S}_{(2d-4,4)}V \bigoplus...$


$\bigwedge^2(Sym^d V)=\mathbb{S}_{(2d-1,1)}V\bigoplus \mathbb{S}_{(2d-3,3)}V\bigoplus \mathbb{S}_{(2d-5,5)}V \bigoplus...$

share|cite|improve this question
Are you referring to this: Pieri formula? – draks ... Oct 10 '12 at 19:01
yes, exactly. I feel like the idea is to show that the sum of characters on the right hand side in either case is the same as the character on the left, I'm just not sure exactly what the character on the left should be. – Chet Oct 11 '12 at 1:00

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.