Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ vector space over $\mathbb{R}$ with $\dim(X)=3$. and let $T\colon X\to X$ be a nilpotent linear map. How can I show that $X$ must have infinitely many $T$-invariant subspaces if and only if $T\circ T=0$.

share|cite|improve this question

If $X$ is nilpotent, i.e. $X^n = 0$ for some $n$, then $0$ is the only possible eigenvalue of $X$. IF $X \neq 0$, this leaves you with only two possible jordan canonical forms of $X$, namely $$ \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \quad\text{and}\quad \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \text{.} $$ (Note that you can't have a pair of complex conjugate eigenvalues, since that'd mean that $T$ acts as a rotation on some 2-dimensional subspace and hence isn't nilpotent)

In the first case, you have $T^2 \neq 0$, so what remains to show is that exactly the second case has infinitly many $T$-invariant subspaces. That the second case has infinitely many $T$-invariant subspaces is quite obvious - every linear combination of $(1,0,0)$ and $(0,1,0)$ spans such a subspace. This leaves you with arguing why the first case can only have finitely many $T$-invariant subspaces (4, if I'm not mistaken), which I'll leave to you.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.