Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$T: [0,1)^{2}\rightarrow[0,1)^{2}$ by

$T(x,y) = (2x,\frac{y}{2})$, with $0 \leq x < \frac{1}{2}$

and

$T(x,y) = (2x-1, \frac{y+1}{2})$, with $\frac{1}{2} \leq x < 1$

In class we said this $T$ is

a) invertivle

b) measurable

c) measure preserving.

My last Analysis and Stochasitc class is quite a time ago and so I do not see that easy how $T$ fulfills a)-c)....

I hope someone can tell my why this is true, or give me some hints how I can find that out myseld :)

Best, Luca

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Jonas, Shailesh, Leucippus, zz20s, Daniel W. Farlow Jun 21 at 2:50

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Jonas, Shailesh, Leucippus, zz20s, Daniel W. Farlow
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
To check it's invertible, you could simply find the inverse. It's a piecewise linear map so it shouldn't be too bad. You know it's measurable because it's piece-wise continuous. You should check the measure-preserving property by drawing what happens to points under $T$. – Christopher A. Wong Oct 9 '12 at 23:37

youre taking the square, smooshing it down and stretching it out. then cut off the excess and put it on top. (draw a picture). clearly invertible (just undo what you did). preserves measure (doesnt change areas, should be clear, what happens to the area of a little rectangle under $T^{-1}$?).

share|cite|improve this answer
    
Hey! First thanks for the Answers! My $T^{-1}(x,y) = (\frac{x}{2},2y)$ for $0 \leq y < \frac{1}{2}$ And $= (\frac{x+1}{2},2y-1)$ for $\frac{1}{2} \leq y < 1$. – Luca Oct 10 '12 at 0:40
    
I pushed enter too early ;) Hey! First thanks for the Answers! The baker trafo describes taking a rectangle, strech it, fold it and turn it a quater. Hence if I name the two halfs $A$ and $B$, then $A$ has $\frac{1}{2}$ of the area and $T(A)$ sends it again to $\frac{1}{2}$ of the area. And then $T(A)$ intersects $A$ and $B$ in a square of area $\frac{1}{2}$. Well so informally, if we take the measure of $A$, and go the streching/folding.. back, than we still have the same area for $A$? How do I write this more formally? – Luca Oct 10 '12 at 0:47

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.