Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm analzying a computer science paper and just found in the experimental setup the following statement:

  • Average (standard deviation) of number of files per peer: 464 (554)
  • Min - max number of files per peer: 100 - 4,774

Are these numbers possible at all? It does not say anything of a normal distribution, but how is it possible that the standard deviation is 554, but the min number of files per peer is 100?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Suppose we have $n$ numbers $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$ ranging from $a$ to $b$, meaning that $x_i = a$ for at least one $i$, $1 \leq i \leq n$, and $x_j = b$ for at least one $j$, $1 \leq j \leq n$. Duplicates are allowed, meaning that two or more of the $n$ numbers could possibly have the same value in $[a, b]$. Define the mean $\bar{x}$ and the variance $\sigma_x^2$ of the set of $n$ numbers as $$\bar{x} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n x_i, ~~ \sigma_x^2 = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \bar{x})^2 = \left(\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2\right) - \bar{x}^2.$$ For convenience, let us change the set to $y_1, y_2, \ldots, y_n$ where $y_i = x_i - a$, so that the new set has values ranging from $0$ to $b-a$. The mean $\bar{y}$ is just $\bar{x}-a$, while the variance is unchanged: $\sigma_y^2 = \sigma_x^2$. Now, it is shown in the answers to this question on stats.SE that the ratio $\sigma_y/\bar{y} = \sigma_x/(\bar{x}-a)$ can be no larger than $\sqrt{n-1}$. Note that the value does not depend on $b$ at all You don't say what the value of $n$ is, but given the numbers in your answer, the upper bound on the standard deviation is $$\sigma_x = 554 \leq (464-100)\sqrt{n-1}$$ which is certainly satisfied except in the unusual circumstance that there are only $3$ peers in the experiment and thus only $3$ numbers $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$ are being described in terms of mean/standard-deviation/min-max: certainly overkill!

In summary, there are no obvious problems with the standard deviation being larger than the mean.

share|cite|improve this answer
Makes very much sense! Thanks a lot! (by the way, n is in the experiment 2000) – navige Oct 9 '12 at 20:41

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.