Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is the relation between the classification of binary quadratic forms over $\mathbb Z$, and the problem of finding the class numbers of quadratic fields?

What would be a nice reference for this?

share|cite|improve this question

For a very beautiful, modern, and general treatment, see this paper of Melanie Matchett Wood. The classical comparison is explained at the beginning of the paper, and then it goes on to develop very general results. I think it is a very beautiful treatment of the subject; even the classical statements are made much clearer than is usual (in my experience) in more traditional treatments.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for sharing that link. It is indeed a very nice exposition. There are some older treatments that go partway there, but I cannot recall them off the top of my head. – Bill Dubuque Oct 18 '12 at 14:37

My favourite reference on this subject would be the excellent treatment contained in the book "Primes of the form $x^2+ny^2$ by D. A. Cox - see here

He gives a lot of details of the historical background (going back to Fermat and Euler) to both binary quadratic forms and the class number problem for quadratic fields. It is not really a textbook, but is very readable with many interesting exercises, and a huge collection of references for further study.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you very much! I will try to get hold of this book – agleaner Oct 8 '12 at 22:34
For a more modern treatment (but also much much more sophisticated), you might look at J-P, Serre's book "A Course in Arithmetic" - see here, but this book requires much more by way of algebraic knowledge. – Old John Oct 8 '12 at 22:38

Along with Cox, I like Duncan Buell, Binary Quadratic Forms because it does pretty much everything with integral forms, including indefinite forms and those with odd $b$ in $f(x,y) = a x^2 + b x y + c y^2.$ It gives explicit calculations for composition, particularly computer algorithms. see HERE

share|cite|improve this answer
Notice that computations for the composition go back to Gauss, or earlier. – awllower Feb 2 '13 at 4:53
I have been wondering whether explaining (in possibly somewhat informal style) the connection between QFs and class numbers would make a fine topic for a blog post. In that case you would be the logical choice to author it. I guess many members like me have only seen the class group way of thinking about it. The references are there, sure, but still? – Jyrki Lahtonen Jun 17 '14 at 9:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.