Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $Y_1,..,Y_n$ be random variables. Given that for all $1\le k \le n-1,k\in \mathbb{N}$, $Y_k$ is independent to the joint distribution of the other $n-1$ random variable, prove that $Y_n$ is also independent of the other $n-1$ random variables. I have tried to show that all $Y_1,...,Y_{n-1}$ are independent but not sure how to show that even $Y_n$ are independent of joint distributions $Y_1,...,Y_{n-1}$.

share|improve this question
    
What happened to this question? –  Did Oct 29 '12 at 11:09
add comment

2 Answers

Let $\phi_k$ be bounded functions with the support on the domain of the corresponding $Y_k$. Consider: $$ f(Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_{n-1}, Y_n) = \phi_1(Y_1)\phi_2(Y_2) \cdots \phi_{n-1}(Y_{n-1}) \phi_n(Y_n) $$ The independence of $Y_1$ from the remaining random variables means that: $$ \mathbb{E}\left(\phi_1(Y_1)\phi_2(Y_2) \cdots \phi_{n-1}(Y_{n-1}) \phi_n(Y_n)\right) = \mathbb{E}\left(\phi_1(Y_1)\right) \cdot \mathbb{E}\left(\phi_2(Y_2) \cdots \phi_{n-1}(Y_{n-1}) \phi_n(Y_n)\right) $$ Since $Y_2$ is also independent of the other $n-1$, we get: $$ \mathbb{E}\left(\phi_1(Y_1)\phi_2(Y_2) \cdots \phi_{n-1}(Y_{n-1}) \phi_n(Y_n)\right) = \mathbb{E}\left(\phi_1(Y_1)\right) \cdot \mathbb{E}\left(\phi_2(Y_2)\right) \cdot \mathbb{E}\left(\phi_3(Y_3) \cdots \phi_{n-1}(Y_{n-1}) \phi_n(Y_n)\right) $$ Continuing for $k \leqslant n-1$ we get: $$ \mathbb{E}\left(\phi_1(Y_1)\phi_2(Y_2) \cdots \phi_{n-1}(Y_{n-1}) \phi_n(Y_n)\right) =\prod_{k=1}^{n-1} \mathbb{E}\left(\phi_{k}(Y_k)\right) \cdot \mathbb{E}\left(\phi_n(Y_n)\right) = \prod_{k=1}^{n} \mathbb{E}\left(\phi_{k}(Y_k)\right) \tag{1} $$ Since eq. $(1)$ holds for arbitrary bounded functions $\phi_k$, it implies that $\{Y_k\}$ are independent of one another and, in particular, that $Y_n$ is independent of the previous $n-1$ random variables $Y_1,\ldots, Y_{n-1}$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Assume $n=3$. Then $Y_2$ is independent of $(Y_1,Y_3)$, in particular $Y_2$ is independent of $Y_3$. And $Y_1$ is independent of $(Y_2,Y_3)$, hence $Y_1$, $Y_2$ and $Y_3$ are independent. The case $n\geqslant4$ is similar.

Here is a way to really learn something from the question: justify each step of the (indications of) proof given above for the case $n=3$. If a step stays unclear, just say so.

share|improve this answer
    
then use mathematical induction to prove n right?? –  Mathematics Oct 8 '12 at 15:50
    
?? Provided you have a clear idea of the recursion you would be using. –  Did Oct 8 '12 at 15:53
    
but we only know $Y_2$ is indepedent to the joint pmf of $Y_1,Y_3$ instead of $Y_1,Y_3$ –  Mathematics Oct 8 '12 at 16:07
    
A random variable is not independent to the joint probability distribution of other random variables, a random variable is (or is not) independent of other random variables (defined on the same probability space). So... what do you think your hypothesis means exactly? –  Did Oct 8 '12 at 16:11
    
i guess it is saying may be the pmf of $Y_2$ and joint pmf of $Y_1,Y_3$ –  Mathematics Oct 8 '12 at 16:13
show 2 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.