Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let's have the periodic function




where $t_0$, $t_1$ and $t_2$ are equally spaced. All I need to know is the sign of the sum

$\sum\limits_{i=0}^{i=2} {f(t_i)f′(t_i)}$

Obviously, however, the above function is not differentiable and therefore $f′(t_i)$ cannot be determined. Can I substitute the above sum by the product of the average function value for the period and its second-order divided difference and thus make a conclusion about the sign of that sum -- say, in the case at hand claim that it's negative?

share|cite|improve this question
You must interpolate the periodic function $f(t_n)$ first. – doraemonpaul Oct 9 '12 at 22:52
up vote 0 down vote accepted

I think we can assume that $f'(t_0)<0$, $f'(t_1)=0$ and $f'(t_2) = -f'(t_0)$.

Then $\sum\limits_{i=0}^{i=2} {f(t_i)f′(t_i)} = 0$

share|cite|improve this answer
Under that assumprion, said sum (with $i$ running from 0 to 4) will be negative for a function having the values -5, 0, -5, -10, -5, right? Is the assumption acceptable, though? – ganzewoort Oct 8 '12 at 10:47
I thought in this way: $i_1$ is max (where f(i_1)=0) => $f'(i_1)=0$, in point $i_0$ function increase so $f'(i_0)>0$ and so on. – Nikita Evseev Oct 8 '12 at 15:54
This seems to me to be the case as well but I'd like to hear objections, if a all, from other mathematicians. If there are none, I'll accept the answer. – ganzewoort Oct 8 '12 at 16:03
@nikiat2 You certainly can not make that assumption unless you have further information about $f$. Samples of $f$ at finitely many points say nothing about the possible values of $f'$. – fgp Oct 20 '12 at 12:26
@fgp Ok, in this case we can not say anything about the sum. – Nikita Evseev Oct 20 '12 at 16:58

In fact $f(t_n)$ is not difficult to interpolate, just $f(t_n)=\dfrac{5\cos\pi n-15}{2}$

Then $\sum\limits_{i=0}^{2}f(t_i)f′(t_i)=\sum\limits_{i=0}^{2}\dfrac{5\cos\pi i-15}{2}\left(-\dfrac{5\pi\sin\pi i}{2}\right)=0$

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks a lot, doraemonpaul. This is similar to @nikita2's suggestion, isn't it? By the same token $\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{i = 4} {\left(5 sin \left( i \frac{\pi}{2} \right) - 10 \right) \left(5 cos \left( i \frac{\pi}{2} \right) \right)} < 0$ which shows that treating $f'(t)$ in terms of $\delta$-functions is incorrect since it yields 0. Do you agree with that? – ganzewoort Oct 10 '12 at 10:52
What reason is there to pick this particular interpolation, and not any other of the gazillion possible interpolations? You might just as well pick a desired value for the sum in question, and then construct an interpolation which produces it... – fgp Oct 20 '12 at 12:29

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.