Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Lets pretend i have some function $f(x) = 2*x_1 + 3*x_2$, and says find first order approximation around some point [a b].

I know the formula $f_a (x) = f(x') + f(x)'*(x-x')$, but do not know how to plug in 2 dimensional point in place of x'

By the way x' is a x hat, i do not know how to write here x hat :) And $f_a ()$ is affine

share|cite|improve this question
If $x_1$ and $x_2$ are different variables, then our expression is its own linear approximation. If you had something like $x_1^2+3x_1x_2+x_3^3$, you would use partial derivatives, essentially find the tangent plane. – André Nicolas Oct 8 '12 at 5:45
ok, but how should i plug things into that formula, what would be the answer in the above case? – ASROMA Oct 8 '12 at 5:49
The $f(x)'$ should be $f(x')'$. (Unfortunate choice of alternative point, $x'$.) – copper.hat Oct 8 '12 at 5:50
@VaheMusinyan: If $x=(x_1,x_2)$, you get the linear approximation $2x_1+3x_2$. Or, equivalently, $2(x_1-a)+3(x_2-b)+ 2a+3b$. – André Nicolas Oct 8 '12 at 5:55
up vote 2 down vote accepted

This does not answer the main question, since that takes no work at all. So we deal with the $f(x_1,x_2)=e^{x_1+x_2}+x_1^2+x_2^3$ of a comment by the OP, in a neighbourhood of $(0,1)$. We have $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_1}=e^{x_1+x_2}+2x_1.$$ At $(0,1)$ this is $e$. Similarly, $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_2}=e^{x_1+x_2}+3x_2^2.$$ At $(0,1)$ this is $e+3$. So the linear approximation is $$(x_1-0)(e)+(x_2-1)(e+3)+ (e+1).$$ The last term $e+1$ is just $f(0,1)$.

We can simplify the above expression a little.

share|cite|improve this answer
so my answer above is correct. hah ;) thanks – ASROMA Oct 8 '12 at 7:03
It depends on what your answer is. The only answer that I see below in a comment is $e^{x_1+x_2}+ 3x_2-2$, which is not right. The answer, simplified, is $ex_1+(e+3)x_2-2$. – André Nicolas Oct 8 '12 at 7:13

In this case $f'(x) = \begin{bmatrix} 2 & 3 \end{bmatrix} $.

The first order approximation (which is the function, since it is linear) is given by:

$$f_a(x) = f(x') + f'(x')(x-x') = 2x_1'+3x_2'+ \begin{bmatrix} 2 & 3 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} x_1-x_1' \\ x_2-x_2' \end{bmatrix} = 2x_2+3x_2$$

share|cite|improve this answer
can you give the answer for this example, i cannot get the correct answer e^$(x_1 + x_2) +x_1^2 + x_2^3$ around [0 1]? – ASROMA Oct 8 '12 at 6:16
can you give me an answer for the case e^$(x_1+x_2)+x_1^2+x_2^3$ around [0 1]? – ASROMA Oct 8 '12 at 6:34

You will have to use a generalized formula. You can look this up here .

The idea is that you ask your function: "How do you change from this point (a,b) if I change this one variable while holding the other fixed?" for both variables and simply add the two contributions where the rates of change, which are nothing but the partial derivatives, are multiplied by the values of change, e.g. $x_1 -a$ etc. This correction turns out to be the directional derivative of the function at $(a,b)$ in direction of your change vector: $f_1 (\vec{x}) = f(\vec{x}_0) + (\vec{x}-\vec{x}_0) \cdot \vec{\nabla} f \vert_{\vec{x}_0}$. Try this out for your function - it is a special one, it is already quite linear!

share|cite|improve this answer
can you give the answer for this example, i cannot get the correct answer e^$(x_1+x_2)+x_1^2+x_2^3$ around [0 1]? – ASROMA Oct 8 '12 at 6:18
$\vec{\nabla} f$ is a vector with the partial derivatives of $f$ and is called the gradient. The directional derivative at a point has another defintion (using a curve in time that passes through the point with the right velocity, then taking the time derivative). It can be shown with the chain rule that this geometric thing is indeed the expression above, the scalar product of the gradient and a vector of displacement. But you do not need all this to solve the problem. I just gave you two ways for visualization ;) edit: the calculation for this problem is the answer above, $f' = \nabla f$ – Andreas Finke Oct 8 '12 at 6:20
if the correct answer really involves the exponential function please check that you have typed in the example correctly – Andreas Finke Oct 8 '12 at 6:24
can you show me the solution by using fa(x)=f(x′)+f′(x')∗(x−x′) formula PLEASE? i am getting e(x1+x2) + 3*x2 - 2 what is wrong? – ASROMA Oct 8 '12 at 6:25
ah, this is another example. Well I think you are right with your solution! – Andreas Finke Oct 8 '12 at 7:43

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.