Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In the book Quarternion and Rotation Sequences, I can't seem to work out how the final equation (colored in $\color{red}{red}$) is derived from the original equation (colored in $\color{blue}{blue}$).
I did check using Wikipedia's list of trigonometric identities as my references as well as the book errata but to no avail.
I copy/paste the text that is giving me problem literally below:


Thus our tracking transformation has axis of rotation given by $$\color{blue}{v=\left(k,\frac{k\sin\alpha}{\cos\alpha-1},\frac{k\sin\beta}{\cos\beta-1}\right).}$$
Notice that in this computation we determine only the direction of the axis of rotation.
Should we wish to obtain a specific vector as the axis of rotation we may,
for instance, choose $k = -1$, to obtain
$$v=\left(-1,\frac{\sin\alpha}{1-\cos\alpha},\frac{\sin\beta}{1-cos\beta}\right).$$
We note that by using the trigonometric identity
$$1-\cos\alpha=2\sin^{2}\frac{\alpha}{2}$$
we may write the following expression for the axis of the rotation $$\color{red}{v=\left(-\sin\frac{\alpha}{2}\sin\frac{\beta}{2},\cos\frac{\alpha}{2}\sin\frac{\beta}{2},\sin\frac{\alpha}{2}\cos\frac{\beta}{2}\right)}$$

Anyone have any idea?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Facts:

  1. $1-\cos{2\theta}=2\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2}$.
  2. $\sin{\theta}=2\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\cos\frac{\theta}{2}$, which we can rearrange to $\displaystyle\frac{\sin{\theta}}{2\sin\frac{\theta}{2}}=\cos\frac{\theta}{2}$.

Steps:

So, starting with $$\color{blue}{\vec{v}=\left(k,\frac{k\sin\alpha}{\cos\alpha-1},\frac{k\sin\beta}{\cos\beta-1}\right)}.$$

Since it doesn't matter what $k$ we use, pick $k=-1$ and this becomes

$$\vec{v}=\left(-1,\frac{\sin{\alpha}}{1-\cos{\alpha}},\frac{\sin{\beta}}{1-\cos{\beta}}\right).$$ We can use fact 1 to replace the denominators of the second and third components, obtaining $$\vec{v}=\left(-1,\frac{\sin{\alpha}}{2\sin^2\frac{\alpha}{2}},\frac{\sin{\beta}}{2\sin^2\frac{\beta}{2}}\right).$$ Now multiply through by $\sin\frac{\alpha}{2}\sin\frac{\beta}{2}$ and we get $$\vec{v}=\left(-\sin\frac{\alpha}{2}\sin\frac{\beta}{2},\frac{\sin\alpha\sin\frac{\beta}{2}}{2\sin\frac{\alpha}{2}},\frac{\sin{\beta}\sin\frac{\alpha}{2}}{2\sin\frac{\beta}{2}}\right).$$ Finally, we use fact 2 on the second and third terms. $$\color{red}{\vec{v}=\left(-\sin\frac{\alpha}{2}\sin\frac{\beta}{2},\cos\frac{\alpha}{2}\sin\frac{\beta}{2},\cos\frac{\beta}{2}\sin\frac{\alpha}{2}\right)}.$$

share|improve this answer
    
thanks, I didn't know that you could just multiply the equation by $\sin\frac{\alpha}{2}\sin\frac{\beta}{2}$ on Right Hand Side only. –  kypronite Oct 7 '12 at 5:42
1  
Yeah - since it is a vector, doing so only affects the magnitude, and this proof only aims to find the direction of $\vec{v}$. –  Alexander Gruber Oct 7 '12 at 5:48
    
ic,yeah.That made much more sense. –  kypronite Oct 7 '12 at 10:41

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.