Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $M$ be a compact manifold (w/o boundary). Suppose that there is no closed geodesics on $M$ of length precisely $C$. I am trying to prove that there is an open cover $\{U_j\}$ of $M$ and $\epsilon >0$ with the following property: if $\gamma$ is a unit speed geodesic in $M$, $C-\epsilon < t < C+\epsilon$, then $\gamma(0)$ and $\gamma(t)$ do not lie in the same $U_j$.

It seems like this would be amenable to a compactness argument of some sort, perhaps using an exponential neighborhood at each point. But, I am not seeing a good way to do it. Any suggestions?

share|improve this question
    
Do you want to prove this for all j? –  Tomás Oct 7 '12 at 1:16
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The exponential map considered as a map on the tangent bundle $\exp: TM \to M$ is continuous. Let $S_C := \{(p,v)\in TM\mid |v|_p = C\}$.

By assumption, we have $d(p,\exp_p(v)) > 0$ for all $(p,v)\in S_C$. So by compactness of $S_C$ and continuity of $(p,v)\mapsto d(p,\exp_p(v))$, there exists $\delta > 0$ such that $d(p,\exp_p(v)) \ge \delta$ for all $(p,v)\in S_C$. If you now choose a small $\epsilon > 0$, then (again using compactness) you will still have $d(p,\exp_p(v)) \ge \delta/2$ for all $(p,v)\in TM $ such that $C-\epsilon< |v| < C+\epsilon$. So this $\epsilon > 0$ and any covering of diameter $<\delta/2$ will do the job.

share|improve this answer
    
Hey Sam. I have two questions. What assumption are you assumig when you say $d(p,exp_{p}(v))>0$. I think this is always true when $|v|_{p}\neq 0$ or no? When you conclude $d(p,exp_{p}(v))>\delta$, are you assuming $(p,v)\in S_{C}$? –  Tomás Oct 7 '12 at 1:28
    
No, $d(p, \exp_p(v))$ could be zero if there was a closed geodesic. For example on the sphere you have $$\exp_p(v) = p\cos(|v|) + \frac{v}{|v|}\sin(|v|)$$ so $\exp_p(v) = p$ if $|v|$ is an integer multiple of $2\pi$. To the second question, yes. I have forgotten to mention that, thank you. –  Sam Oct 7 '12 at 1:34
    
ok you are right. Thanks by the patient. –  Tomás Oct 7 '12 at 1:39
    
@Tomás: that there is no closed curve of length exactly $C$ implies that $p\notin \{\exp_pv|v\in T_pM, |v|=C\}$. –  Berci Oct 7 '12 at 1:41
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.