Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $f(x) = \begin{cases}e^{-x} & ,0<x<1\\0 & ,\text{Otherwise}\end{cases}$

I'm trying to calculate the fourier transform of $xf(x)$, by using the fact that $xf(x) = -\frac{d}{da}f(a x)\bigg|_{a=1}$ and $\mathscr{F}\{f(a x)\} = \frac{1}{a}\hat{f}(\frac{\omega}{a}), \quad a>0$.

The fourier transform should be: $$\mathscr{F}\left\{-\frac{d}{da}f(a x)\bigg|_{a=1}\right\} = - \frac{d}{da}\left(\frac{1}{a}\hat{f}(\frac{\omega}{a})\right)\bigg|_{a=1} $$

This gives the answer: $$\frac{-e+(1+i\omega+\omega^2) \cos(\omega )+i \ (1+i\omega+\omega^2) \sin(\omega )}{e \sqrt{2 \pi } \ (i+\omega )^2}$$

But the correct answer is: $$\frac{-e+(2-i \omega) \cos(\omega)+(2 i+\omega) \sin(\omega)}{e \sqrt{2 \pi \ } (i+\omega)^2}$$

The answer is close to the right one, the difference is $\frac{e^{i\omega-1}}{\sqrt{2 \pi}}$, but why it's not correct?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The reason is that your derivative $x f(x) = - \frac{d}{da} f(ax)|_{a=1}$ is not quite valid because the function you are differentiating is discontinuous. If you interpret it in the distribution sense, you get an additional term of the form $\frac1e \delta_1(x)$, where $\delta_1$ is the Dirac distribution with mass at $x=1$. The Fourier transform of this extra term is exactly the difference between your solution and the correct one.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, this makes perfect sense. –  0912 Oct 6 '12 at 18:22
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.