Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

How can we prove $\bigtriangledown = \bigtriangleup E^{-1}$?

where,$\bigtriangleup \rightarrow \text{ Forward difference operator }$ $\bigtriangledown \rightarrow \text{ Backward difference operator }$ $E \rightarrow \text{ Shift operator }$ I tried to utilize the method of seperation of symbol but not quite there...

Give some hints for this proof.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

How about writing $\bigtriangleup(f(x))=f(x+1)-f(x)$, $E^{-1}(f(x))=\ldots$, so $\bigtriangleup E^{-1}(f(x))=$?

share|cite|improve this answer
Got it! One thing in my book $\bigtriangleup(f(x))$ is defined as $f(x+h)-f(x)$ where the consecutive values of $x$ differs by $h$ I have seen the proof of this derivation, I do agree that in problem solving I mean in while composing the difference table we do use $\bigtriangleup(f(x))=f(x+1)-f(x)$ but aren't we should use $f(x+h)-f(x)$ while proving equalities like this one? – Quixotic Feb 7 '11 at 15:32
It depends upon what definition you are using for $\bigtriangleup$. In analyzing polynomials they often use +1. In calculus I have seen h, because we think of h as small. The proof is the same either way as long as you are consistent. – Ross Millikan Feb 7 '11 at 15:35
Hm thanks. – Quixotic Feb 7 '11 at 15:46
I have also seen the forward difference with a subscript $\bigtriangleup_h$ to show you what the size of the interval is. – Ross Millikan Feb 7 '11 at 16:41

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.