Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know that bounded functions on compact intervals $[a,b]$ with only finitely (or countably) many discontinuities are Riemann integrable. What is an example of an unbounded function with only finitely many discontinuties defined on a compact interval $[a,b]$ which is not Riemann integrable?

I assume there must be some for the bounded hypothesis to be needed.

share|cite|improve this question
The Riemann integral is defined for bounded functions. Are you looking into improper integrals? – Pedro Tamaroff Oct 6 '12 at 3:21
@Peter only for... – David Mitra Oct 6 '12 at 3:22
@DavidMitra You mean it should read "The Riemann integral is defined only for bounded functions"? What is the problem? – Pedro Tamaroff Oct 6 '12 at 3:25
@David I had completely misread the question, by the way. – Pedro Tamaroff Oct 6 '12 at 3:54
up vote 3 down vote accepted

$$[a,b] = [-1,1], \quad f(x) = \begin{cases} 1/x, & x \ne 0 \\ 0, & x = 0 \end{cases}$$

This function $f$ has exactly one discontinuity, at $x=0$. Intuitively, $f$ should fail to be Riemann integrable because it has infinite area both above and below the $x$ axis.

To show this formally, suppose we are given a mesh size $\delta$; choose $n$ so large that $1/n < \delta$. Since the harmonic series diverges, choose an $m > n$ so large that $\sum_{j=n+1}^m \frac{1}{j} \ge 1$. Now consider the partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $[-1,1]$ consisting of $\{-\frac{i}{n}, 0, \frac{j}{m} : 1 \le i \le n, \, 1 \le j \le m\}$. Note that the mesh of $\mathcal{P}$ is $1/n < \delta$. Tag the partition $\mathcal{P}$ by choosing the points $-\frac{i}{n}$ and $\frac{j}{m}$, $1 \le i \le n$, $1 \le j \le m$ (you can check this indeed results in one point in each interval). The Riemann sum of $f$ corresponding to this tagged partition is $$\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{n} f(-\frac{i}{n}) + \sum_{j=1}^m \frac{1}{m} f(\frac{j}{m}) = \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{-1}{i} + \sum_{j=1}^m \frac{1}{j} = \sum_{j=n+1}^m \frac{1}{j} \ge 1.$$ On the other hand, if we choose the partition $\mathcal{P}' = \{ -\frac{j}{m}, 0, \frac{i}{n} : 1 \le i \le n, 1 \le j \le m\}$, then $\mathcal{P}'$ also has mesh $1/n < \delta$, and by a similar computation, the Riemann sum corresponding to $\mathcal{P}'$ is at most $-1$.

$\delta$ was arbitrary, so this shows that the Riemann sums do not converge as the mesh size tends to 0. Thus $f$ is not Riemann integrable.

share|cite|improve this answer
Could you elaborate? – Pedro Tamaroff Oct 6 '12 at 3:32
Nevermind, I misread the question. +1 – Pedro Tamaroff Oct 6 '12 at 3:56
@PeterTamaroff: I added a proof anyway :) – Nate Eldredge Oct 6 '12 at 3:58
I don't see the need to be so elaborate. You can select a tag $t_0$ from the subinterval $[0,1/m]$ so that $f(t_0)\cdot{1\over m}$ is as large as you desire. So, keeping the tags for the other subintervals fixed, you can construct Riemann sums as large as you desire. (Of course, a similar argument shows that a Riemann integrable function must be bounded.) – David Mitra Oct 6 '12 at 4:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.