Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ be a topological space and $N$ a subset of $X\newcommand{\int}{\operatorname{int}}$. since $\bar N$ is closed, then $\bar{ \bar N}=\bar N$. Knowing that by definition $\bar A=\int(A)\sqcup \partial A$, the identity $\bar{ \bar N}=\bar N$ is equivalent to $\int(N)\sqcup \partial N=\int(\bar N)\sqcup \partial \bar N$. It is known that $\partial \bar N\subset \partial N$ and $\int(N)\subset \int(\bar N)$ this means that when we "close" $N$ some of the boundary poins become interior points in the closure. Now suppose that $N$ is open, then $\partial \bar N=\partial N$ and $\int(\bar N)=\int(N)=N$ is my reasoning correct? thank you for your clarification!!

share|cite|improve this question
To whom it may concern, I have added an \int command to the LaTeX code in the question, which means it is also available in comments and other answers on the page. E.g. $\int(\mathbb Q)=\varnothing$. – Asaf Karagila Oct 5 '12 at 22:42
up vote 3 down vote accepted

$\newcommand{\cl}{\operatorname{cl}}\newcommand{\bdry}{\operatorname{bdry}}$Consider the open set $N=(0,1)\cup(1,2)$ in $\Bbb R$: $\cl N=[0,2]$, and $\int\cl N=(0,2)\ne N$. Moreover, $\bdry\cl N=\{0,2\}\ne\{0,1,2\}=\bdry N$.

An open set $U$ such that $U=\int\cl U$ is called a regular open set. Every $T_3$ (regular + $T_1$) space has a base of regular open sets, and the regular open sets of any topological space form a complete Boolean algebra that has applications in set theory.

share|cite|improve this answer
What sort of applications? – Asaf Karagila Oct 5 '12 at 23:20
@Asaf: Forcing via Boolean-valued models. It’s a matter of opinion how important that is; I may remove the adjective. – Brian M. Scott Oct 5 '12 at 23:26
Oh, I think that Boolean-valued models is a very important use. I had a discussion with some friends about it. While it's not very usable in everyday forcing arguments, it does give a lot of insight on the inner workings of forcing. E.g. every countable forcing is Cohen forcing; every intermediate model of ZFC between the ground is a generic extension of the ground, and the full extension is generic over it; and several other theorems of this manner. I suppose that you mean the completion of the poset to a Boolean algebra, right? – Asaf Karagila Oct 5 '12 at 23:29
@Asaf: Yep, exactly that. – Brian M. Scott Oct 5 '12 at 23:30

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.