Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Find $\lim_{x\to \infty} \ln(e^{\operatorname{LambertW}(x)}+1)(e^{\operatorname{LambertW}(x)}+1) - x - \ln(x)$

Where the $LambertW$ function is defined here :

How to do this ?

share|cite|improve this question
I see no difference after the edit ? Only the + for infinity has been removed , which ironicly I would consider an edit if it was left out. Maybe I wrote find without capital. Im not complaining Im just curious what it was. – mick Oct 4 '12 at 14:36
As for the suggestion of tag special function , that special function can be easily substituted away. So Im unsure about that. – mick Oct 4 '12 at 14:37
The special function tag might attract other people to the question. Don't be mad, edits are made to help the OP as well as the readers. For example $$\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \big\{(e^{W(x)} + 1)\ln\big(e^{W(x)}+1\big) - x - \ln(x)\big\}$$ is far more readable. – Pragabhava Oct 4 '12 at 14:42
@Pragabhava : Hmm the $e$ instead of $exp$ is worth consideration. But not everybody knows $W(x)$ although I could define it. But Im more concerned about leaving out the +. – mick Oct 4 '12 at 15:01
@Pragabhava : Besides Im not mad. Extravert Psychology : Axiom 1 : 'not complaining' <-> not mad. Ok I made that up :) – mick Oct 4 '12 at 15:04
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Maple says $$ \lim_{x \to \infty}\left[\operatorname{e} ^{\bigl(LambertW (x) + 1\bigr)} \operatorname{ln} \biggl(\operatorname{e} ^{\bigl(LambertW (x) + 1\bigr)}\biggr) - x - \operatorname{ln} (x)\right] = \infty $$ if that's what you mean. In fact, $$ \lim_{x \to \infty}\frac{1}{x}\left[\operatorname{e} ^{\bigl(LambertW (x) + 1\bigr)} \operatorname{ln} \biggl(\operatorname{e} ^{\bigl(LambertW (x) + 1\bigr)}\biggr) - x - \operatorname{ln} (x)\right] = e-1 $$

edit Oct 4

OK, on this limit $$ \lim_{x\to\infty}\left[\Bigl(\operatorname{e} ^{W (x)} + 1\Bigr) \operatorname{ln} \Bigl(\operatorname{e} ^{W (x)} + 1\Bigr) - x - \operatorname{ln} (x)\right] $$ Maple says "Too many levels of recursion". So I used $e^{W(x)}=x/W(x)$ and then let $x=e^y$. (Also use: $\ln W(e^y) = y - W(e^y)$.) Now Maple says $$ \lim_{y\to\infty} \;\left[\frac{\operatorname{e} ^{y} \operatorname{ln} \bigl(\operatorname{e} ^{y} + W \bigl(\operatorname{e} ^{y}\bigr)\bigr)}{W \bigl(\operatorname{e} ^{y}\bigr)} - \frac{\operatorname{e} ^{y} y}{W \bigl(\operatorname{e} ^{y}\bigr)} + \operatorname{ln} \Bigl(\operatorname{e} ^{y} + W \bigl(\operatorname{e} ^{y}\bigr)\Bigr) - 2 y + W \bigl(\operatorname{e} ^{y}\bigr)\right] = -\infty $$ which is claimed as your answer...

share|cite|improve this answer
No that is not what I meant. You got the +1 at the wrong position. Besides are you sure that is not a maple bug ? – mick Oct 4 '12 at 19:27
Thanks. I might come back to this but this gets me going. – mick Oct 12 '12 at 15:23

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.