Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose $\phi:G_1 \rightarrow G_2$ is a group homomorphism and $H \leq G_1 $. Show that $\phi^{-1}(\phi(H))=H \cdot \ker(\phi) $.

Attempt at a solution:

I was easily able to show that $\phi^{-1}(\phi(H))\subseteq H\cdot \ker(\phi)$ due to the fact that if $h \in H$ and $k\in \ker(\phi)$ then $\phi(hk)=\phi(h)$.

However I'm having trouble with the reverse inclusion. That is, showing that if $hk\in H\cdot \ker(\phi)$ then $hk\in \phi^{-1}(\phi(H))$.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

share|cite|improve this question

If $h\in H$ and $k\in\ker\varphi$, then $\varphi(hk)=\varphi(h)\varphi(k)=\varphi(h)\in\varphi[H]$, so by definition $hk\in\varphi^{-1}[\varphi[H]]$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Because of the details you included in your OP, I'm really surprised you didn't find that inclusion first. I'm wondering if maybe you put up the opposite inclusion that you intended(?).

If that's the case, then keep reading:

Suppose $x\in \phi^{-1}(\phi(H))$. Then $\phi(x)=\phi(h)$ for some $h\in H$. It follows that $\phi(xh^{-1})=1$, hence $xh^{-1}\in \ker(\phi)$. Thus, $x\in \ker(\phi)h\subseteq \ker(\phi)H$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.