Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm trying to integrate a complex valued function over the extended real domain $[0,+\infty]$, for which I'm attempting to use the residue calculus. My function has a number of poles above the real axis, so I'm computing the residues for some of these to see what I get. All residues work out to nice values, except for one at $z=2\pi i$ which I was surprised to see has a value of $\infty$. My question is this: is it possible for a residue at a pole to take on an infinite value?

As example, say I try to compute the residues of $$f(z)=\frac{\arctan(z/(2\pi))}{e^z-1}.$$

If my understanding is correct I can compute the residue using $$\text{Res}(f;2\pi i)=\lim_{z\rightarrow 2\pi i}\frac{\arctan(z/(2\pi))}{e^z}=i\infty,$$

where I have just differentiated the denominator.

share|improve this question
1  
If it is possible, I'd expect the value to be simply $\infty$ rather than $+\infty$. I.e. in this context, there's only one infinity rather than the $\pm\infty$ sometimes considered in real analysis, and you approach $\infty$ by going in any direction whatsoever in $\mathbb C$, not just in one of the two "real" directions. –  Michael Hardy Oct 3 '12 at 16:42
    
What is residue value at point $z=\infty$? Sum of all residue values including residue at infinity is equal $0$. –  M. Strochyk Oct 3 '12 at 16:51
add comment

1 Answer

I think the problem is that the numerator in the example is not analytic in a neighbourhood of $z=2\pi i$. Hence, any contour I use should in fact avoid this point.

share|improve this answer
1  
Under "numerator in the example is not analytic at $z=2\pi{i}$" you mean "numerator in the example is not analytic in the punctured neighbourhood $z=2\pi{i}"$? –  M. Strochyk Oct 3 '12 at 17:06
1  
yes, $\arctan$ around $z=i$ is a lot like $\log$ around $z=0$, which is trouble. Eliminating the trouble means pulling back by doing a change of variable like $z = 2 \pi \tan u$, though now you will see that you're not really integrating on a contour anymore. –  mercio Oct 3 '12 at 18:08
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.