Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $t\in [0,a]$, $X_t:=\sum_{i=1}^{N_t}Y_i$ be a compounded Poisson process, i.e. $N_t$ a Poisson process with parameter $\lambda>0$ and $Y_i$ are iiid with distribution $\mu$. Now let $S_t:=\exp{(\sum_{i=1}^{N_t}f(Y_i)+(\lambda-\eta)t)}$, where $\eta>0$ and $f(x):=\log{(\frac{\eta}{\lambda}h(x))}$. We assume that there is a absolutely continuous measure $\hat{\mu}$ with respect to $\mu$ such that $h$ is the Radon-Nikodym derivative, i.e. $h(x):=\frac{d\hat{\mu}}{d\mu}(x)$. I want to prove $E[Z_t]=1$. What I did so far:

$$E[Z_t]=E[\exp{(f(Y_1))}\cdots\exp{(f(Y_{N_t}))}\exp{((\lambda-\eta)t)}]=\exp{((\lambda-\eta)t)}E[\exp{(f(Y_1))}\cdots\exp{(f(Y_{N_t}))}]$$

Now $\exp{(f(Y_j))}=\exp{(\log(\frac{\eta}{\lambda}h(Y_j)))}=\frac{\eta}{\lambda}h(Y_j)$, so first since the $Y_j$ are identical distributed we have

$$E[\exp{(f(Y_1))}\cdots\exp{(f(Y_{N_t}))}]=(\frac{\eta}{\lambda})^{N_t}E[h(Y_1)^{N_t}]$$

and then by independence

$$(\frac{\eta}{\lambda})^{N_t}E[h(Y_1)^{N_t}]=(\frac{\eta}{\lambda})^{N_t}E[h(Y_1)]^{N_t}=(\frac{\eta}{\lambda}E[h(Y_1)])^{N_t}$$

We end up with $E[Z_t]=\exp{((\lambda-\eta)t)}(\frac{\eta}{\lambda}E[h(Y_1)])^{N_t}$. If this should be one, we must have

$$(\frac{\eta}{\lambda}E[h(Y_1)])^{N_t}=\exp{(-(\lambda-\eta)t)}$$

Here I'm stuck. I guess I have to use, that $h$ is the Radon-Nikodym derivative and the distribution of $N_t$. Or did I a mistake so far? Some help would be appreciated!

share|improve this question
@did Thank you for the hint! You're right, $\hat{\mu}$ is also a probability measure. However could you give me a hint how to calculate $E[(\frac{\eta}{\lambda}h(Y_1))^{N_t}]$, this is what I actually have to calculate, right? – hulik Oct 2 '12 at 17:56
Actually, I'm done, if $E[h(Y_j)]=1$, but I do not see this. Of course $E[h]=1$, but why the composition? – hulik Oct 2 '12 at 18:21
Thank you for your help – hulik Oct 2 '12 at 19:32

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Since $N_t$ is a random variable, what you computed so far is $\mathbb E(Z_t\mid N_t)$, not $\mathbb E(Z_t)$. To get the value of $\mathbb E(Z_t)$, consider $\mathbb E(\mathbb E(Z_t\mid N_t))$. You will probably end up being forced to use a hypothesis which is missing from your post, namely that $\hat\mu$ is a probability measure.

By definition, if $\hat\mu$ is a probability measure, then $\mathbb E(h(Y))=\displaystyle\int h(y)d\mu(y)=\int d\hat\mu(y)=1$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.