Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I try to find the surface area of any solid by using cylindrical slices, I'm getting wrong answer. I'm taking this as the formula,

$$S = \int_a^b2\pi y dx$$

where $y$ = height ($2\pi y$ = circumference of the cylinder) $dx$ = width. We can approximate the surface area using cylindrical shells right? If we can approximate volume, we can also approximate surface area right? This is my argument... Please help.

share|cite|improve this question

Actually, approximating surface area by cylindrical shells doesn't work, for the same reason that $\pi \neq 4$ in this thread

Cylindrical shells do not give the correct "small" surface element because they are all "almost" parallel to the axis of revolution.

The correct formula for $y=f(x)$, $a \leq x \leq b$ to find the surface area of the surface formed by revolving $f$ around the $x$-axis is $$ S=2\pi\int_a^b f(x)\sqrt{1+(f'(x))^2}dx. $$

More information on this topic can be found at or by googling "surface area by revolution".

share|cite|improve this answer
$\pi \ne 4$ is here at… – Ross Millikan Oct 2 '12 at 15:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.